Channel 4 News presenter Jon Snow has said he is "in favour" of the broadcaster's possible privatisation, after the Government inadvertently revealed its proposals.
The 67-year-old, who has presented the programme for more than 25 years, defended the network, saying any plans would have to be well thought-out.
Snow said at the Radio Times Festival: "As you would imagine, I am vigorously in favour of privatisation of Channel 4, not least because I am thinking of buying share options.
"But then, when I think about it, I think there is something very precious about the settlement that is Channel 4. It's a very successful television station, which generates a very great deal of money, all of which goes back into making programmes, and particularly making the news, which is very, very expensive. Very good news coverage is seriously expensive."
He continued: "I'm not myself opposed necessarily to privatisation. If anything, if it works much better than any other way, that's the right thing to do.
"But what I'm arguing here is it's a very, very delicate set-up, and if you move a bit of it about, it may break, and therefore it's worth preserving."
Snow added: "Channel 4 doesn't make anything at all, so you might even say - shove that. But actually what it does is to commission. It commissions other people to make stuff, so it is a fantastic generator of small industries, small production companies who make very interesting, textured programmes.
"And one of the production companies they commission is ITN, who make Channel 4 News."
A memo with the heading Assessment Of Channel 4 Corporation Reform Options, said to be held by an official in Downing Street, was posted on Twitter by freelance photographer Steve Back (@PoliticalPics).
The "official - sensitive: commercial" document, dated September 24 2015, noted there has been a recent meeting between Cabinet Office Minister Matthew Hancock and two unnamed secretaries of state, with the phrases "extracting greater public value" and "focusing on privatisation options in particular" clearly visible.
In response to the photo, a Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) spokeswoman said: "The Government has made no decisions regarding reform of Channel 4.
"Channel 4 has an important remit and we are looking at a range of options as to how to continue to deliver this, including options put forward by Channel 4."
Culture Secretary John Whittingdale has previously denied any plans to privatise the state-owned, commercially funded broadcaster, while refusing to rule it out in the future.
At the Edinburgh TV festival in August, he said: "The ownership of Channel 4 is not currently under debate. Do I say there are no circumstances in which I would ever consider it? No, I don't."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here