TURMOIL in Scotland's college sector has come a step closer after lecturers backed moves to hold a ballot on industrial action in a row over pay.
The Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) union, which represents lecturers, said the offer of one per cent from management was unacceptable and that a move to strike action was "highly likely".
A special meeting of members organised by the EIS agreed that a ballot should go ahead and also ratified a "co-ordinated and sustained campaign of industrial action" in pursuit of a better pay settlement.
The union argues staff at some colleges are receiving £7,000 a year less than others doing the same job elsewhere.
The EIS wants all unpromoted lecturers to earn up to £40,386, amounting to an uplift of between 3.3 per cent and 25 per cent across the best and worst-paying colleges. However, colleges argue the claim is unrealistic and unaffordable.
Larry Flanagan, general secretary of the EIS, said: "The special conference has decided the actions that should now be taken to pursue a satisfactory settlement on lecturers' pay.
"It is profoundly disappointing that, in the first set of pay negotiations within the national bargaining framework, the management side has dragged discussions on for almost a year and then presented a final offer that would only compound issues of pay inequality throughout the sector.
"The EIS will now begin the process of balloting our further education lecturer members for industrial action."
Shona Struthers, chief executive of Colleges Scotland, said recently that national bargaining had been absent in the college sector for over 20 years and that there were "a number of issues" that required to be addressed.
She said: "Mechanisms have had to be put in place to move from local to national bargaining and then there is the issue of delivering an across-the-board pay increase that is in line with public sector pay policy. There is also the need to address variances in pay around the country.
“The solution proposed by EIS would actually cost the sector over 13 per cent more in wages on average. This is not realistic and definitely not sustainable."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel