New figures on emergency payments to benefit claimants show that the UK government is creating 'horrifying' levels of destitution, according to an academic.
Data published by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) shows a dramatic increase in the number of people claiming hardship payments since stricter rules were brought in.
Three years ago the government introduced a controversial sanctions regime with stricter rules leading to more people having benefits stopped for allegedly breaking the rules and longer, more severe penalties for those sanctioned.
Since then, Dr David Webster, of Glasgow University's School of Social and Political Sciences, said that the figures showed a sharp increase in the rate of claims for hardship awards. Before October 2012, fewer than 10 per cent of those sanctioned were claiming the emergency payments. That rose to 30 per cent by February 2013, and has since climbed to more than 40 per cent, he said.
Hardship payments can be claimed by those who are left without any income due to benefit sanctions, and enable them to receive 60 per cent of the benefits they have had stopped, or 80 per cent of they are deemed to be especially vulnerable.
Dr Webster added: "The most striking feature is the huge increase in the number of hardship payments immediately upon Ian Duncan Smith's introduction of the more severe sanctions regime, with longer sanctions."
"What these figures show is that a higher proportion of a larger number of applicants, are completely destitute."
A DWP spokesman said the number of hardship claims had dropped again in more recent months and said Dr Webster's analysis was misleading: "Our well established system of hardship support offers additional support for those who need it," she said. "The fact that the number of applications has fallen by more than 40pc over the last year is positive news.
"We know that the best way to support people is to help them into work – and we now have record employment, a growing economy and unemployment is back to pre-recession levels.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel