FOURTEEN Scottish college principals shared nearly £2.4 million in pay-outs under a controversial national merger scheme.
According to new figures, the highest payment was £315,000 awarded to Ronnie Knox, the former principal of North Glasgow College, under a deal already questioned by public spending watchdog Audit Scotland.
John Doyle, the former principal of Coatbridge College, received the next highest payment of £304,000 - a package which is currently under scrutiny from Holyrood's public audit committee following concerns of poor governance.
Other significant payments were the £249,000 paid to Brian Lister, former principal of Stevenson College, £248,898 to former principal of Langside College Andrew Haddon and £202,000 to Miles Dibsdall from Telford College.
Overall, the figures from the Scottish Funding Council (SFC) show total payments to principals of £2.38m under the 10 mergers in the college sector between 2012 and 2014.
The information was published as Mr Doyle prepares to return to the public audit committee for the second time to answer questions on his severance payment, which has been criticised by Audit Scotland.
Larry Flanagan, general secretary of the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) union, which represents lecturers, highlighted the concerns of lecturers and support staff, many of whom have been made redundant under the merger programme and wider college cuts.
He said: "While payment in case of redundancy is normally appropriate, it is essential that the process is robust and fair, particularly when there have been significant job losses for teaching and support staff throughout the further education sector over the past few years.
"It is clear the redundancy terms offered to lecturing and support staff were nowhere near as generous as some of the packages that were paid to very senior managers."
An SFC spokesman said college boards of management were responsible for deciding on severance packages for principals, but should do so in line with national guidance.
He added: "We place reliance on assurances from audit processes and would not usually get involved in the detail of severance arrangements.
"The exception to this approach would be if we became aware of any significance governance issues and our interventions at Coatbridge College are an example of this.
"Consequently, SFC did not see the business cases relating to severances nor the finer detail of the components that make up the individual severance payments."
Meanwhile, in advance of his appearance today at the public audit committee, Mr Doyle submitted written evidence to the committee refuting claims by the college remuneration committee which approved his deal.
Members of the committee told MSPs they had not seen SFC guidance suggesting an upper limit on severance payments of 13 months before they approved Mr Doyle's deal of 24 months.
He responded: "Contrary to what they have repeatedly stated to the parliamentary audit committee, all members of the college remuneration committee were very aware of the SFC guidelines. For the record, I did not withhold information from the college remuneration committee."
Mr Doyle also said he "completely refuted" allegations he had colluded with college chair John Gray to withhold evidence from the remuneration committee.
The findings come after a raft of mergers in the further education sector since 2011/12 which has seen the number of colleges fall from 37 to 20.
When the plans were announced, the Scottish Government said mergers would deliver £50m of efficiency savings each year from 2015/16, along with other benefits such as reduced duplication, better engagement with employers and better outcomes for students.
The use of severance payments in the merger process was seen as an essential short-term measure as overall numbers of executive staff were cut, with savings expected in the long-term.
However, Audit Scotland identified six colleges where the way severance arrangements for senior staff were handled fell short of good practice.
And the public audit committee has already argued there are insufficient figures to demonstrate whether the merger process has generated promised efficiency savings.
Severance Payments to College Principals 2011-2014
College Principal Cost of Release
Anniesland Linda McTavish £126,058
Angus John Burt £174,000
Ayr John Muir £146,164
Carnegie Geoff Fenlon £170,511
Coatbridge John Doyle £304,254
Coatbridge Margaret Livingstone £104,000
Clydebank Gordon Paterson £126,031
James Watt Sue Pinder £163,000
Langside Andrew Haddon £248,898
Langside Graeme Hyslop £85,885
North Glasgow Ronnie Knox £314,946
Stow Bob McGrory £186,230
Stevenson Brian Lister £249,000
Telford Miles Dibsdall £202,000
* A college appears twice if the principal left before the merger and an acting principal took over.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel