IAIN Duncan Smith has called for the Treasury to be broken up, branding George Osborne's powerful department "the worst thing in Britain".
The former Work and Pensions secretary claimed the Exchequer dominated UK Government decision-making, which had grown powerful under the chancellorship of Gordon Brown. This, he said, had left it with “enormous” power over other departments in Whitehall.
But the Essex MP claimed it was characterised by a "lack of vision" and a "short-term" obsession with cuts.
Mr Duncan Smith - who resigned his cabinet role in March in a row with the Chancellor over benefit cuts - complained that other ministers had to "fight at all stages" with the Treasury over policy.
The Scot said he gave a "sigh of relief" when he left government because he would "never have to deal with those people again".
Mr Duncan Smith declared: "The worst thing we have in Britain is the Treasury; it has to be broken up…”
At a round-table discussion with journalists and political figures, the former minister complained: "The culture of the Treasury is almost unique in the Western world; that a country's government is so dominated by one organisation.”
He went on: "The average age in the Treasury is 27. They spend no more than two years in any single part of the Treasury. They have no collective memory for any agreement or decision that had been taken before they arrived at their desks.
"Everything is up for grabs immediately someone new moves in and they dictate every single policy area across government. It is a fight at all stages."
Mr Duncan Smith claimed the sort of decisions made in countries such as Germany and the US to support industry were "very difficult" in the UK because of the Treasury's dominance..
"It's not a department that is characterised by the concept of vision. This is a department that is characterised solely by a lack of vision," he added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel