The traumatic effects of a wrongful conviction on former prisoners is to be studied for the first time by a team of academics who will conduct a series of interviews in Scotland.
The project will see leading criminologists from the University of Oxford come to Glasgow and interview victims of miscarriage of justice who are now free.
The new study – backed by Scottish charity the Miscarriages of Justice Organisation - will focus on life after release.
The findings will be written up as a thesis and form part of lead researcher Laura Tilt’s Doctorate in Criminology.
She said: “This will be one of the first studies of its kind in the United Kingdom. Research on wrongful conviction to date has focused on how they occur and are overturned - there is so far very little empirical research on the post-exoneration experience outside the United States.
“In the UK, legislation has now significantly restricted the possibility of obtaining compensation. In this very dismal climate, the lived experiences of the wrongfully convicted can inform what post-release support is available - or should be available - to repair the harms caused by wrongful conviction. Simply quashing a conviction is not enough.”
The Miscarriages of Justice Organisation has long campaigned for greater support for former prisoners who were wrongly convicted.
Co-Project Manager, Paul Mclaughlin, said: “This study is welcomed because it will look into the post-exoneration experience of persons who have been wrongfully convicted, to explore how such persons cope with their experience and what support they receive to help them to manage the practical and emotional impact of exoneration.
“We feel the study is vitally important to everyone fighting for justice for the innocent. The study will allow us to produce the evidence required to show the true impact of wrongful conviction, and will be a tool, which will aid all those fighting for the rights of the innocent and wrongfully convicted.”
Former teacher James Boyle was sentenced to twelve years in prison in 2005 for historical sex offences against three children.
The 60-year-old from Rutherglen served five years before he was cleared when a second trial ended with a not proven verdict – but he has been unable to return to work. He welcomed the study and will be one of the interviewees.
Boyle said: “I think in terms of when someone is released from prison, the legal representation must be made available on the same basis as it was made available to the complainers so that people in my position are able to defend themselves and challenge institutions.
“That is fundamental because, unless you’re an extremely wealthy person, without that access you are immediately hobbled. So, I think we need legal services to be provided to us for as long as we need them.
“We need redress, restorative justice, public enquiries and whatever assistance it takes to deal with the impacts in terms of the psychological and health damage.
“I had to deal with allegations that I was a paedophile when I’m not. That is clearly a damaging thing to have to deal with.
“The other side of the coin is it always has a very bad physical impact. For example, doctors have told me the fact I have chronic stomach and bowel problems is down to the stress and strain.”
Mclaughlin has urged potential interviewees to contact MOJO for more information about the study.
He said: “We are trying to identify anyone who has been exonerated, their friends and family, and professionals who have who have worked with exonorees, who may want to contribute.
“Laura Tilt will be at our office in Glasgow from Monday July 11 until Friday July 22, doing interviews for the project.
“We would like to encourage anyone who may meet the criteria of the study to arrange an appointment.
“If they wish to contribute. Interviews will be held at the MOJO office in Glasgow but arrangements can be made to visit anyone who would like to contribute to the research.”
To find out more about the study, telephone 01415520009 or email info@miscarriagesofjustice.org.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here