The UK's largest oil firm is expected to warn that leaving the EU could trigger another independence referendum.
Shell executives will also caution that an independent Scotland could struggle to afford the billions of pounds needed to support decommissioning in the crisis-hit North Sea when they meet investors later this week.
READ MORE: Brexit vote would spark second Scottish independence bid, says SNP's Angus Robertson
The warning comes just a day after a survey suggested that nearly one in three of the UK’s oil and gas firms is planning further job cuts this year, following a global slump in prices.
Hundreds of posts in Aberdeen have already been axed.
Last month it emerged that the industry was running at a loss to the taxpayer for the first time since records began.
The pumped £24million more into investment and decommissioning than it got back in tax revenues last year.
READ MORE: Brexit vote would spark second Scottish independence bid, says SNP's Angus Robertson
Just five years ago the sector contributed £11bn to the Exchequer.
In 2014 Ben van Beurden, Shell's chief executive, said that the oil giant would prefer the UK to remain a "single country".
But he also said that the company would "deal" with independence, if it happened.
That same year he argued that the EU's economic challenges were "best tackled - to the benefit of all - with the UK's voice loudly expressed and loudly heard inside the EU.
READ MORE: Brexit vote would spark second Scottish independence bid, says SNP's Angus Robertson
"It's for similar reasons that we'd like to see Scotland remain part of the United Kingdom."
Earlier this year Mr van Beurden was among executives who signed a letter, organised by Downing Street, backing 'Remain'.
A spokesman for Shell said: "Our position has not changed."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel