The family of a woman who died after lying in a crashed car for three days despite the accident being reported to police said a new report takes them "another step closer to knowing what happened".
The Police Investigations and Review Commissioner (Pirc) watchdog has submitted a second report to the Lord Advocate on the circumstances surrounding the M9 tragedy.
Mother-of-two Ms Bell was critically injured in the crash off the M9 near Stirling and died later in hospital. Her partner Mr Yuill, 28, died at the scene.
While the couple lay in the wreckage, police put out a missing-person appeal.
The new report examines why a phone call to police reporting a car off the road on July 5 was not followed up and the procedure followed to log the call.
Investigators also probed the "robustness" of the missing-person inquiry and why this was not linked to the phone call.
Read more: Family of M9 crash victim Lamara Bell hit out at First Minister over tragedy comments
It follows an interim report sent to the Lord Advocate - Scotland's top prosecutor - in November.
The Lord Advocate will now consider the findings in the second report before deciding what action to take, including whether to hold a fatal accident inquiry or start a criminal prosecution.
The Bell family said in a statement: "The past eleven months have been one of heartache for us all, especially for Lamara's two children, Alysha and Kieran.
"However, the sincere wishes and support from the local community and beyond has helped us greatly with the grieving process.
"The pain of losing Lamara in such tragic circumstances will never go away, but with the completion of this supplementary report from the Police Investigations and Review Commissioner we are another step closer to knowing what happened to Lamara and John on that fateful day."
Read more: A Fatal Accident Inquiry expected into M9 crash tragedy, says outgoing Lord Advocate
The Yuill family added: "We are pleased the supplementary report has been completed and that it will hopefully take us nearer to some insight or answers as to what happened with John and Lamara on July 5 last year."
A Pirc spokesman said: "The commissioner's investigators pursued numerous lines of enquiry, including why a telephone call made to Police Scotland on July 5 2015, which reported a car off the road, was not followed up.
"The commissioner also examined the procedures used by Police Scotland to log the particular call made on July 5 2015.
"The investigation also looked at the robustness of Police Scotland's missing-person inquiry and why this was not linked with the information received in the telephone call.
"This has been an exhaustive investigation which has required many different facets of the incident to be fully explored.
"The commissioner will undertake further enquiries as required."
Assistant Chief Constable Kate Thomson said: "Our thoughts remain with the family and friends of Mr Yuill and Ms Bell.
"Anyone affected by this incident including their families, colleagues within the service and the communities we serve continue to be offered our support.
"The Police Service of Scotland has worked with both Pirc and Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary Scotland (HMICS) to ensure that we fully understand the circumstances that led to the deaths of Lamara Bell and John Yuill, and any wider issues concerning our contact, command and control centres, and the service we provide to the public who call us.
"We are committed to resolving any issues, which gave rise to this tragic incident and continue to implement the recommendations made by HMICS, under the scrutiny of the Scottish Police Authority.
"We now await the decision of the Crown following their consideration of the Pirc report, and as such the service is not in a position to respond to specific issues or questions raised."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel