A FORMER Labour First Minister has said he is "very, very attracted" to independence if it means Scotland keeps its place in Europe as he labelled Thursday's referendum is a "game changer" for country's constitutional debate.
Reflecting on what he described as a "unbelievably shocking and disastrous result" for the UK, Henry McLeish also said it was time for Scotland to consider "what kind of political company we're keeping" following the emergence of "trickle down racism" and xenophobia in England.
Another Scottish Labour grandee, the widely respected former health secretary Malcolm Chisholm, said he believed yesterday would go down in history as the day that independence for Scotland became inevitable.
Mr McLeish, who supported a No vote in 2014 despite speculation he would back Yes, said an altogether different proposition would be on the table following the shock referendum result, which saw all 32 council areas in Scotland vote to Remain but Leave triumph UK wide, if the issue of independence is put again. His comments came shortly after Nicola Sturgeon said a referendum within two years is "highly likely".
He said: "We have now got to a point that has changed the whole dynamic of Scotland and the union. Scotland's choice now is does it want to be part of the UK out of Europe, or does it want to be out of the UK and a part of the European Union. I am very, very attracted to the notion that we be part of the European Union.
"I've always maintained this is not a narrow nationalist question. All the political parties should be debating what Scotland's interests are, where Scotland should be and what kind of country we want to be.
"Intellectually, politically and I suppose psychologically I'm really warming to the notion that Scotland should at some point, in some context, have another choice to make."
Mr McLeish, who led the county between 2000 and 2001, added: "Scotland and England are diverging at an accelerating rate in terms of politics. Referendums are dangerous, they become a lightning rod for grudge and grievance. What really perturbed me was the English nationalism that was emerging, the xenophobia.
"It was Mitt Romney who coined the phrase 'trickle down racism'. He was talking about Trump, but I could equally apply it to Farage. I think apart from just the EU vote, there's a lot for Scots to digest about what kind of political company we're keeping when you have Farage, Johnson and as I describe them, the march of the Trumps down south."
He called on Scottish Labour leader Kezia Dugdale, who earlier this year indicated she would consider backing independence if Scotland was dragged out of the EU but quickly backtracked, to open up a debate within the party that would include consideration of breaking away from the UK.
"She [Ms Dugdale] has a right to say this is beyond narrow nationalism, it's beyond the custodianship of the First Minister however eloquent she is," he added. "This is a Scotland issue, partisanship and tribalism has got to come second. She could do all of that without committing the party or anyone to a specific definite policy.
"Far too often, politicians do not say what they think. This is not a time for hiding behind the barricades. This is a time for debate that Labour's never had in Scotland, that says to Scots 'we are passionate about our country'. This is a time to speak out, last night was a game changer, a quite astonishing result of 32 council areas voting to stay in."
Ms Dugdale described the Brexit vote as "distressing" but said the priority now was best summed up by the phrase "keep the heid".
She said: "First and foremost our priority must be to stabilise the economy - to reassure people about their jobs, about their pensions and about the opportunities that are yet to come."
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel