BRITONS lost almost £12.6 billion on gambling last year, a rise of more than a third on five years ago.
Online gambling accounted for almost a third of gambling losses, according to the Gambling Commission, with punters losing £3.63bn to internet betting and online casino and bingo sites.
A record £1.71bn was spent on fixed-odds betting terminals, which have hit the headlines in recent years over concerns they are highly addictive.
Earlier this year peers called for stakes on the machines – typically electronic games such as black jack, roulette and poker, found in betting shops – to be slashed to help avoid addiction. Liberal Democrat Lord Clement-Jones said the gaming machines were “destroying lives and damaging communities”.
The machines, which allow people to place bets of up to £100 at a time, account for 56 per cent of betting shops’ profits, while in-shop betting figures fell.
Campaigners want the maximum stake reduced to £2 to help reduce “serious harm,” deter money laundering and cut betting shop “clustering” on the high streets.
While £12.55bn was lost by punters between October 2014 and September 2015, the actual amount bet was higher as the figure only covers betting losses, not the amount staked.
The commission also reported that although almost 200 high-street bookmakers closed, there are still more than 34,700 in towns and cities in Britain.
The number of bingo halls has fallen by more than 10% in a year and there are now fewer than 600, while the amount of money bet at casinos fell to less than £1bn.
But the 147 casino halls were still visited more than 20 million times from October 2014 to September 2015.
The prevalence of arcade machine halls also plummeted, dropping from 1,937 in March 2015 to 1,721 by March 2016.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article