POLICE Scotland hired a high-profile QC who worked for the police on the Hillsborough and Birmingham pub bombing legal cases to represent the single force in the illegal spying scandal.
Jeremy Johnson was instructed to represent the cash-strapped organisation after officers unlawfully used their snooping powers to go target journalists’ sources.
It has also emerged that chief constable Phil Gormley has asked Durham Constabulary to carry out an independent investigation into the scandal.
Police Scotland broke the law last year after using the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) to establish if four serving and retired officers had leaked information to the media.
The forced failed to get judicial approval for the mole hunt, which directly related to a newspaper report into the failed police investigation into murdered prostitute Emma Caldwell.
A watchdog ruled that the breaches had been “reckless” and the four individuals took their cases to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal earlier this month.
Police Scotland accepted the actions had been unlawful, but the IPT heard claims that the breaches had been wilful rather than accidental.
Craig Sandison, a QC representing three of the four men, successfully argued for an outside police force to be tasked with investigating the circumstances of the illegal spying.
However, although Police Scotland has faced claims recently that officers have had to buy equipment from charity shops, the single force hired one of the UK’s top policing lawyers to act on its behalf.
Johnson, who has been described as a “class act” and “phenomenal”, was the QC who represented West Midlands Police during the inquests into the deaths arising from the Hillsborough disaster.
Although South Yorkshire Police had been in charge of planning and operational duties on the day of the tragedy, WMP carried out the original probe into the conduct of officers.
Johnson also represented the same force in recent court hearings that related to the Birmingham pub bombings over forty years ago.
In November 1974, 21 people were killed after a bomb widely believed to have been planted by the IRA exploded.
Six men were wrongly imprisoned for the atrocity and an inquest that had been stopped in the 1970s was recently re-opened.
The high-profile lawyer was also used by the Metropolitan Police to represent the force in the cases involving undercover officers who had sexual relationships with female targets.
He also worked on the inquests into the deaths of Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Al Fayed, where he represented the Secret Intelligence Service, the Security Service and Government Communications Headquarters.
Johnson’s biography states: “Jeremy acts for claimants, chief constables, police and crime commissioners and the Independent Police Complaints Commission in all cases involving the police...”
Police Scotland now accepts an independent investigation into the row will take place.
Deputy chief constable Iain Livingstone said: “The Chief Constable, Phil Gormley, has asked Mike Barton, Chief Constable, Durham Constabulary, to conduct an independent investigation into a number of non-criminal complaints, which relate to matters connected to the breach of communications data protocols and guidance.
“We await the findings of the IPT and will comply with any directions given. Police Scotland has fully accepted that standards fell below those required in this case. It would be inappropriate to comment further at this stage given the investigation is to be conducted by Chief Constable Barton.”
Liberal Democrat MSP Liam McArthur said: "Police Scotland seem more interested in spending big money on lawyers than focusing on making the changes we need to ensure that this never happens again. Their priorities are all wrong. Police Scotland ignored rules that are in place to protect our privacy to try and uncover journalistic sources. This was a clear attack on the freedom of our press."
Police Scotland did not comment on hiring Johnson.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel