Andy Burnham has won the battle to be Labour candidate for the mayor of Greater Manchester.
The shadow home secretary said it was a "great honour" and told the Government he would ensure it follows through on its promise of a "northern powerhouse" if he wins the 2017 election.
He beat interim mayor Tony Lloyd and former minister Ivan Lewis to secure the nomination.
Mr Burnham won the contest among party members with 3,792 votes to Mr Lloyd's 2,163 and Mr Lewis's 1,472, on a turnout of 65.3%.
"To be selected as Labour's candidate for the first elected mayor of Greater Manchester is a great honour and I thank our members for the faith they have shown in me," he said.
"I will repay it by devoting all my energy to uniting the Labour family here, working to win back the voters we have lost and building a policy programme with broad appeal. I will bring forward real answers to our housing crisis and give new hope to our young people.
"Today, I have a clear message for the Prime Minister - you and your party were elected on a series of promises to the North of England and I will not let you walk away from them.
"You promised us a powerhouse and now you must give us the tools and investment to build it."
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said: "Congratulations to Andy Burnham on being selected as Labour's candidate for Greater Manchester metro mayor.
"This will be an opportunity for Labour to take its message for social justice to the region's two million voters in next year's election.
"It's crucial that we have a mayor willing to do everything possible to improve the lives of everyone in Greater Manchester and in Andy we have that candidate."
Mr Burnham said he would stand down as an MP at the "first and earliest opportunity" if he wins the race to become mayor, as appears likely given that almost all of Manchester's council seats are filled by Labour.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article