Springwatch presenter Chris Packham reiterated his call for a ban on grouse shooting as a petition to Parliament reached the 100,000 signatures needed to trigger a Commons debate.
A day after being branded an extremist by cricket legend Sir Ian Botham, Packham praised those who signed the petition and insisted “in the end you can’t argue with the truth”.
It comes after the official start of the grouse shooting season, with August 12 known as the Glorious Twelfth.
Chris Packham (left) and Sir Ian Botham, who is pro-grouse shooting (PA)
In an angry clash on the radio Sir Ian, who supports grouse shooting, attacked the TV presenter for not respecting BBC impartiality rules.
Packham said the shoots damage bird of prey populations while Sir Ian suggested the naturalist should not be allowed to publicly take sides because of his status as a BBC employee.
In the wake of the on-air row the petition reached the threshold required for the Commons Petitions Committee to consider it for debate by MPs.
Packham said: “In the end you can’t argue with science, you can’t argue with evidence, you can’t argue with the truth. And the truth is that people are fed up with this ‘tradition’, the injustice and the lies.
The petition has over 100,000 signatures (Screenshot)
“One hundred thousand people just started to make the world a better place for wildlife and every single one of them will be remembered for that”.
The petition states: “Grouse shooting for ‘sport’ depends on intensive habitat management which increases flood risk and greenhouse gas emissions, relies on killing foxes, stoats, mountain hares etc in large numbers and often leads to the deliberate illegal killing of protected birds of prey including hen harriers.”
The League Against Cruel Sports said the momentum building up against the shoot was now “unstoppable”.
Its head of campaigns Mark McCormick said: “The public recognises that the collateral damage from this minority ‘sport’ based on blasting live birds out of the sky is unacceptable.
Grouse shooting season has just started (Danny Lawson/PA)
“Raptors are being persecuted and hen harriers are facing extinction in England.
“Intensive management of the grouse moors are implicated in environmental damage, devastating floods and wildlife obliteration.
“It’s high time a light was shone on the negative impacts of driven grouse shooting.
“We know that a Parliamentary debate isn’t guaranteed, but the amount of public concern, the number of experts speaking against grouse shooting and the growing evidence of wildlife persecution surely means that a fair debate must be held as a matter of urgency.”
E-petition sponsor Mark Avery said: “I’m thrilled that people across the UK have responded to the call to get a debate in the Westminster parliament over the future of driven grouse shooting. Now we need our politicians to rise to the challenge and take this matter forward.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article