Supporters of Jeremy Corbyn have hit back at London mayor Sadiq Khan after he urged Labour Party members to ditch their leader and back his rival Owen Smith instead.
In a scathing attack, Mr Khan said Mr Corbyn had failed to win the trust of voters and that Labour was "extremely unlikely" to secure a return to power as long as he remained leader.
Read more: Kezia Dugdale and Sadiq Khan hold 'positive' Brexit strategy talks
But a spokesman for Mr Corbyn's campaign said Mr Khan won the mayoralty standing on a Labour platform under Mr Corbyn's leadership and with the backing of a large number of the new members who he had inspired to join the party.
A key trade union ally of the Labour leader described Mr Khan's intervention as "disappointing" and warned that the Labour members in the capital would feel "let down" by his actions.
A spokesman for the Jeremy for Labour campaign, said Mr Corbyn had even defended Mr Khan in the Commons at Prime Minister's Questions when David Cameron accused him of having links with extremists.
Read more: Chief Minister of Gibraltar in Brexit talks with Nicola Sturgeon and Sadiq Khan
"Sadiq Khan is entitled to his opinion," the spokesman said.
"But he won the London mayoralty, as others have pointed out, by standing on a Labour platform under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn backed by the huge numbers who have joined our party to support Jeremy and now campaign for Labour."
Matt Wrack, the left wing general secretary of the Fire Brigades Union and a strong supporter of Mr Corbyn, said Mr Khan's comments were "a little bit disappointing but possibly no great surprise".
"Sadiq comes from that part of the Labour Party that was in government under Blair and Brown," Mr Wrack told BBC News.
"It is disappointing nevertheless. Jeremy Corbyn gave full support for Sadiq in his campaign for mayor, as did a number of unions including my own.
"Sadiq hasn't consulted us or Labour Party members across London about this latest statement. I think a lot of people will be quite let down by that."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel