Readers excited that they may own valuable first editions of the first Harry Potter book have been urged to carefully check that they have the genuine item.
Earlier this month it was reported that a first edition of JK Rowling’s Harry Potter And The Philosopher’s Stone could fetch up to £20,000 at auction.
The first edition (Bonhams)
It was revealed by Bonhams Fine Books and Manuscripts that the edition could be identified by a specific typo, sending Potter fans flying to their bookshelves to check chapter 5.
Just 500 hardback copies were initially printed containing a mistake on page 53, with the repetition of “1 wand” on Harry’s school supplies shopping list.
The rare copy contains the repetition of “1 wand” in Harry’s school supplies list (Bonhams)
But rare bookseller Peter Harrington warned that owners of the book should not get their hopes up, as the mistake was repeated in later editions which are “relatively common”.
A spokesman said they had been “inundated with emails” from people claiming to own valuable copies of the novel.
The bookseller has now issued a guide to identifying a true first edition.
In addition to the error on page 53, the publisher must be listed as Bloomsbury at the bottom of the title page.
Daniel Radcliffe played Harry Potter in the films (WarnerBros Pictures/PA)
The latest date issued in the copyright information must be 1997, the year the novel was first published, and it must have been printed in the UK.
The print line on the copyright page must also read “10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1″.
Earlier this month, Bonhams’ head of books and manuscripts Matthew Haley said: “As the first book in the series, Harry Potter And The Philosopher’s Stone has a special place in the affections of the millions of readers across the world and the proof-reading error about the wand in the first edition has, of course, become a treasured piece of Harry Potter arcana.”
A copy of a first edition of the novel in “exceptionally fine condition” will be auctioned on November 9.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article