A SOCIAL worker involved in the care of murdered child Liam Fee has been described as “disorganised”, “chaotic” and “the most erratic person I have worked with” by her boss at a probe into her conduct.
Lesley Bate faces a succession of charges over her role as a social worker with Fife Council between December 2011 and August 2014.
Ms Bate, who has chosen not to appear before the Scottish Social Services Council conduct sub-committee, was a member of the Glenrothes Child Protection Team who managed the two-year-old’s case
Liam was murdered by his mother Rachel Fee and her civil partner Nyomi Fee at their home in Thornton, Fife, in March 2014.
One charge against Ms Bate is that she failed to follow up concerns raised by a childminder about a one-year-old boy, labelled FF in anonymised SSSC documents.
It alleges that despite the childminder raising concerns on January 15, 2013, “regarding bruising to the face” of the baby – and the next month that “he had a sore neck” – Ms Bate did not act.
During the murder trial of Rachel and Nyomi Fee, childminder Heather Farmer told the court she contacted the Scottish Childminding Association in January 2013 after he turned up with scratches and bruises to his face.
In a separate incident, she raised concerns about the toddler’s neck after he was dropped off at her home on February 18, 2013.
The hearing yesterday was told that Ms Bate’s manager following Liam’s death had “serious questions about her assessment of risk”.
Ms Bate faces a total of 13 charges relating to 16 children, including several allegations that she “failed to take necessary steps to minimise actual or potential risk of harm” for those children.
The hearing was told that in the months following Liam’s death Ms Bate had been under a disciplinary investigation and had been off sick. When she returned she was moved to the Children and Families Team based in Dunfermline.
Her manager there, James Ross, told the hearing how he had tried to “help and support” Ms Bate on her return, but that her work had been “poor”.
She was given a case to handle in which a father of an unborn child had been charged with 21 offences of domestic and sexual violence against women.
However, Ms Bate neglected to mention that in a report going before a Initial Child Protection Case Conference.
In another case involving concerns of neglect over children the hearing was told she failed to undertake planned weekly visits with the express aim of “keeping children safe”, claiming she had simply “forgot”.
And in another she dropped a letter outside her office building containing “the most sensitive information possible” about children she was working with, a document later found in the street by a neighbour.
Mr Ross said: “There had been a lengthy investigation into Lesley’s work before she came to my team.
“That had concluded she be given an opportunity to practise elsewhere in the service.
“She was probably the most erratic person I have worked with.
“She was fine when there was no work to be undertaken, but the minute anything was required she failed to undertake it.
“She absolutely could not understand risk at that point and I had a real concern about her visiting families and drawing a conclusion about what the information was telling her.
“She was very disorganised and presented chaotically. I constantly tidied up for her because I wanted the children to be safe.”
The hearing was told that Ms Bate has “relinquished” her registration as a social worker with the SSSC. However, she does not admit any of the charges against her.
One of her managers, Karen Pedder, is to give evidence later this week. She told the Liam Fee murder trial that the youngster had “fallen off the radar” of social work staff in the months leading up to his death.
The hearing continues and is expected to run until Friday.
Rachel Fee, 31, and Nyomi Fee, 29, were convicted of the murder of Liam and neglect of two other
children earlier this year at the High Court in Livingston and jailed for life.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel