A JUDGE has told jurors at the start of the trial of a man for a murder allegedly committed 18 years ago that they must deliver a verdict “based on the evidence” they hear in court.
Ronnie Coulter, 48, from Wishaw, denies killing 32-year-old Surjit Singh Chhokar in Overtown, North Lanarkshire.
He is alleged to have killed Mr Chhokar on November 4, 1998 by punching him, hitting him with a wooden baton and stabbing him.
He has lodged a special defence of incrimination to the murder charge, blaming Andrew Coulter and David Montgomery.
With Mr Chhokar’s mother and Gurdev Kaur sister Manjit Sangha and the family lawyer Aamer Anwar looking on at the High Court in Glasgow, judge Lord Matthews told the jury: “Your verdict must be based on the evidence you hear in court.”
Prosecutors claim that Coulter was acting with two other men, Andrew Coulter and David Montgomery, at the time of the alleged attack.
The charge includes allegations that Mr Chhokar was punched and had his arms grabbed to prevent him from defending himself.
He is then said to have been hit with a wooden baton before he was repeatedly struck with a knife and killed.
It is further alleged that Coulter did previously “evince malice and ill-will” towards Mr Chhokar.
Coulter is also accused of attempting to defeat the ends of justice on November 4 and 5, 1998 at waste ground between Overton and Gowkthrapple, all Wishaw.
It is claimed he got another person to hide clothes worn during the alleged murder and destroyed, disposed of or concealed a knife.
Coulter is further accused of attempting to pervert the course of justice. He is also charged with forging the signature of Mr Chhokar to help cash a giro cheque for £100.70 and of breaking into Mr Chhokar’s home in Wishaw and stealing a cooker with Andrew Coulter.
Coulter, who is represented by Donald Findlay, QC, denies all the charges against him. The trial before judge Lord Matthews continues. It is expected to last five weeks.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article