Teachers and school leaders overwhelmingly oppose Theresa May's plans for a new wave of grammar schools, a survey has found.
Some eight out of 10 teachers and heads are against the selection proposals and also do not believe the tests taken at age 11 can measure academic potential, according to the research.
It also found 85% do not believe the selection process can be designed to stop other factors, such as parental engagement or income, playing a part.
Read more: Scottish state schools face biggest shake-up in half a century
Most also said they believed there was no evidence to back up the Prime Minister's controversial policy.
The study was based on the responses of more than 2,500 teachers, school leaders and heads to a poll conducted by NAHT (National Association of Head Teachers), the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL) and charity Teach First.
Russell Hobby, general secretary of the NAHT, said: "Increasing the number of grammar schools will lower standards and restrict opportunity. We cannot afford such an elitist policy in the 21st century - as many students as possible need a high quality academic education. This is a terrible distraction from the issues that matter most."
Mrs May pledged to make Britain ''the great meritocracy of the world'' as she announced plans to lift the long-standing ban on new grammars.
But the proposals are deeply divisive and face a rocky passage through Parliament.
Read more: Scottish state schools face biggest shake-up in half a century
Malcolm Trobe, interim General Secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: "We don't need more selection in the education system. What schools desperately need is enough teachers and enough funding, both of which are in critically short supply.
"The government should focus on these issues rather than obsessing about an education policy plucked from the 1950s. Our job is to work together to ensure the education system supports all young people to achieve."
The survey was carried out for campaign organisation the Fair Education Alliance, which has launched a petition calling for the grammar ban to be kept in place.
Teach First founder Brett Wigdortz said: "We are united in our desire to improve social mobility, but it's clear we must use proven policies to achieve this. We know great comprehensive schools and academies are delivering a stretching and ambitious education. We must aim to replicate this for every child, not selecting only a few to be supported to succeed, whilst leaving the majority behind."
Mayor of London Sadiq Khan added his voice to calls to abandon the Government's grammar school plans.
The Labour politician disputed the claim that re-introducing selective education would raise standards in the capital's schools.
He said: "Selection leads to segregation and I believe that increasing the number of grammar schools will only make it harder to ensure that every child is able to fulfil their full potential, and it would guarantee that some children are left behind.
Read more: Scottish state schools face biggest shake-up in half a century
"Unlike the Government, I'm not prepared to give up on providing a place at an excellent school for every child in London.
"If Theresa May is really committed to increasing social mobility through education across the country, she should follow the example that London has set over the past two decades.
"Opening new grammar schools was the wrong policy before, and is still the wrong policy now. I call on the new Government to drop these plans."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel