Grammy winner Richard Carpenter is suing Universal Music Group (UMG) for millions in royalties he claims are owed from licensing Carpenters songs for online services such as Apple’s iTunes.
Richard’s lawsuit seeks more than $2 million (£1.64 million) in royalties and is also being filed on behalf of the estate of his sister, Karen Carpenter, who died in 1983.
The Carpenters won three Grammy Awards in 1970 and 1971, including for their song Close to You.
Karen and Richard Carpenter (PA Archive/PA Images)
The suit, which also names Universal subsidiary A&M Records, is one of a number of lawsuits filed after a 2010 appellate court ruled in a case involving Eminem’s record label that music downloads from services such as iTunes should result in higher payments to artists.
That ruling called for artists to receive substantially higher royalty payments for digital downloads of their music than they do when a physical recording is sold.
Richard says he has been unable to resolve the dispute without suing.
“The Carpenters recordings are among the best sellers in the history of popular music and after 48 years continue to contribute a substantial amount to UMG/A&M’s annual bottom line,” he wrote in a statement. “It seems only fair that these companies account fairly to my sister’s estate and to me.”
Universal Music Group has so far not commented on the case.
Richard has hired attorney Larry Iser, who has represented numerous artists in disputes over licensing and use of their music.
“It is unfortunate that the Carpenters were forced to file this lawsuit primarily over an issue that has already been resolved by the courts – but which these record companies still refuse to acknowledge – that digital downloads occur pursuant to license and are not sales of records,” Iser said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article