DNA matching that of the two men accused of an acid attack on an investigative journalist was found on items recovered at the scene, a forensic scientist has told a court.
Susan Williamson was giving evidence at the trial of William Burns, 56, and Alexander Porter, 48, both from Paisley, who deny assaulting Russell Findlay to the danger of his life by throwing sulphuric acid in his face at his Glasgow west end home on December 23, 2015.
The jury at the High Court in Glasgow heard Ms Williamson examined a red Royal Mail jacket and a red Royal Mail bag found on the driveway, a knife found in the threshold of Mr Findlay’s door, and a jar that had contained acid.
The court was told DNA matching Mr Burns was found on the jacket. The odds on the DNA belonging to anyone else not related to Mr Burns is a billion to one.
The jury heard the red bag had Royal Mail parcel cards inside it, some elastic bands and a pair of glasses.
There was mixed DNA found on the glasses and Ms Williamson told the court that major contributor matched the DNA of Mr Porter.
Prosecutor Richard Goddard asked her: “The DNA of the major contributor on the glasses matched the DNA profile from Alexander Porter?” and she answered: “That’s right.”
Ms Williamson also examined the handle of the knife and said the major DNA contributor was Mr Porter.
The jury was told the chances of the DNA not being Mr Porter’s was also one billion to one.
Mr Burns and Mr Porter also deny attempting to murder Ross Sherlock by shooting at him repeatedly near St Helen’s Primary in Bishopbriggs on September 24, 2015. The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article