Obese and overweight patients are less likely to die after a heart operation than those who are a healthy weight, research suggests.
The new study throws NHS rationing in some parts of the country - where obese patients have been told to slim down before they can have surgery - into doubt.
Experts funded by the British Heart Foundation (BHF) analysed data for the number of people who died in hospital following heart surgery, according to their weight.
The results showed that people who were a healthy weight were almost twice as likely to die as those who were obese or overweight, while those who were underweight had the highest risk of death.
The study, published in the journal Circulation, included 401,227 adults who had undergone heart surgery between 2002 and 2013.
Overall, 11,511 patients died. Some 4.4% people of a normal weight died, compared to just 2.8% who were overweight and 2.7% who were obese. Meanwhile, 8.5% people who were underweight died.
The University of Leicester researchers took into account factors that could influence the results, such as people's age or whether they had other health conditions.
But the study still found that being fat - including suffering complications of obesity such as high blood pressure, diabetes and artery disease - seemed to offer protection,
The researchers also reviewed data from 557,720 further patients included in studies across Europe, the United States and Asia, and found similar results.
Professor Gavin Murphy, BHF professor of cardiac surgery at the University of Leicester, said: "Obesity is a reason often given for not offering patients surgery.
"With this study, we show that, for cardiac patients at least, being obese should not be a reason to turn patients away from surgery.
"These results also raise questions as to whether there may be attributes of obesity that directly protect patients.
"Understanding these processes may open the door to new prevention strategies or treatments."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here