THE SNP has de-selected a series of councillors linked to the so-called “Monklands McMafia” feud in a bid to clean up the party’s reputation in North Lanarkshire.
Four councillors failed vetting to stand for re-election in May, though they can still appeal.
Three are linked to a local old guard dubbed the McMafia, which is centred on Airdrie & Shotts MSP Alex Neil and the Uddingston & Bellshill MSP Richard Lyle.
One is linked to a rival faction close to Coatbridge, Chryston & Bellshill MP Phil Boswell.
A power struggle between the factions last year prompted SNP Headquarters to suspend the Coatbridge branch, saying “a culture of mistrust” had created a “toxic” environment.
The ‘McMafia’ councillors who failed vetting were husband and wife Michael and Agnes Coyle and Dr Imtiaz Majid, while the councillor close to Mr Boswell was David Baird.
Nicknamed “Don Coyleone”, Mr Coyle last year denied being linked to organised crime after a former SNP member’s car was destroyed in a fire, and claimed the police had exonerated him.
He said: “I’ve been accused of gangsterism and having links to organised crime. It’s outrageous. The police conducted a thorough investigation then sent me a letter saying the allegations are not true.”
Dr Majid was recently criticised by a sheriff for trying to cheat his ex-wife out of a fair divorce settlement by hiding assets and pretending to have lost a fortune to a gambling addiction.
He was ordered to pay the mother of his two children £150,000 after a sheriff said some of his evidence in court was “entirely unacceptable and incredible”; he is now appealing.
Two councillors who worked for Mr Boswell, Julie McAnulty and Paul Welsh, passed vetting.
A Labour spokesman said: “While Labour candidates are already campaigning against SNP cuts to vital local services like schools and care for the elderly, Nationalist HQ has only just realised some of their existing councillors aren't up to the job. "
An SNP spokesperson said: “There is an appeal process for all those applicants who were interviewed. We cannot comment on any individual case.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel