Star Wars actor John Boyega has criticised Samuel L Jackson for claiming that black British actors should not take African American roles.
Boyega, who was born in Peckham, south-east London, said the Pulp Fiction legend’s comments did not reflect the complex reality.
Samuel L Jackson claimed that British actors were highly sought after in Hollywood because they are ‘cheaper’ (Chris J Ratcliffe/PA)
Jackson, 68, claimed last month that British actors may not be able to play African American roles as well as those in the US, and suggested Hollywood may favour UK stars because they are “cheaper”.
Boyega, 25, said that his “big unc” Jackson did not need to make the comments.
“Damn, Sam,” he told ES Magazine, smiling. “I love him but he didn’t have to go there. I was actually going to send him a message to check that he’s cool.
“But look, I get it, I just think there’s no end result in black Brits and African Americans going back and forth at each other.
“I rate Sam and he’s always showed me love – he’s like a big unc – but, across the planet, the black experience is a layered one and his comments didn’t represent that.”
Jackson cited Get Out, which portrays an interracial relationship in the US and stars British actor Daniel Kaluuya, and said he wondered what it would have been like “with an American brother who really feels that”.
“Daniel grew up in a country where they’ve been interracial dating for a hundred years,” Jackson said.
“Some things are universal, but (not everything).”
The Star Wars actor makes a front cover (PA/ES Magazine)
Boyega will return to the theatre next month when he stars as a German soldier in Woyzeck at the Old Vic.
He said the stage is a far gentler experience than being on Hollywood shoots costing “250,000 dollars an hour”.
“So this feels like a holiday. A really strenuous holiday with some good people,” he said.
:: Boyega’s full interview is published in ES Magazine today.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel