DRINKS giant Chivas is facing a staff walkout after Acas talks aimed at solving a pay dispute collapsed.
Workers at the whisky firm’s Paisley and Dumbarton plants voted overwhelmingly in favour of industrial action after the French - owned company failed to meet their pay demands.
Unite union had called for a “decent pay increase and harmonisation of pay between sites”, and had rejected a Chivas offer of a multi-year deal.
However an attempt to settle the dispute at conciliatory service ACAS collapsed, sparking the strike ballot.
Yesterday union members at the Chivas site at Paisley voted by 76.4 per cent for strike action and 81.9 per cent for action short of strike.
Unite regional coordinating officer, Elaine Dougall said the ballot showed the strength of feeling among staff, and accused the firm of showing “little respect” for the rules of negotiation. .
“The workers are not for turning,” she said.
“There is a real strength of feeling and they are not prepared to let this happen. The profit per employee for 2016 is £171,000 - so it is not as if there is not money.”
A Chivas Brothers spokesperson said: “We’re disappointed that trade union members have taken the decision to strike.
After a period of constructive and transparent negotiation with employee representatives, we have made several significant improvements and firmly believe our pay offer – which exceeds the rate of inflation in the UK - is fair and reasonable and ensures that our employees have a highly competitive salary and benefits package.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here