Theresa May has announced a wide-ranging inquiry into the contaminated blood “scandal” of the 1970s and 1980s which left 2,400 people dead.
The Prime Minister said the treatment of thousands of haemophiliacs and other patients with blood products infected with hepatitis C and HIV was an “appalling tragedy” which should never have happened.
“Thousands of patients expected the world-class care our NHS is famous for, but they were failed,” she said in a statement.
My initial reaction to the good news of a public inquiry into the NHS #ContaminatedBlood scandal. pic.twitter.com/vbSThdZLhH
— Diana Johnson (@DianaJohnsonMP) July 11, 2017
“At least 2,400 people died and thousands more were exposed to Hepatitis C and HIV, with life-changing consequences.
“The victims and their families who have suffered so much pain and hardship deserve answers as to how this could possibly have happened.
“While this Government has invested record amounts to support the victims, they have been denied those answers for too long and I want to put that right.”
We did it !!!Just been told that Number 10 has capitulated and we will now have our inquiry @DianaJohnsonMP @cazjwheeler @AndyBurnhamGM
— Contaminated Blood (@CBCBlooduk) July 11, 2017
The announcement was welcomed by campaigners who have been pressing for years for an inquiry into the import of the clotting agent Factor VIII from the US.
Much of the plasma used to make the product came from donors like prison inmates who sold their blood which turned out to be infected.
Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham – who as shadow home secretary championed the campaign for an inquiry – said the announcement was a “major breakthrough”, albeit a belated one for people who had suffered for decades.
.@AndyBurnhamGM responds to #Contaminatedblood inquiry: victims 'let down by all political parties + public bodies' https://t.co/kDkt3ycov4
— Paul Waugh (@paulwaugh) July 11, 2017
“This day has taken far too long in coming. People have suffered enough through contaminated blood. They have been let down by all political parties and public bodies,” he said.
“It is now incumbent on those organisations to work together to give the families truth, justice and accountability without any further delay or obstruction.
“It is essential that this inquiry looks at both the original negligence and the widespread cover-up that followed.
“It is also crucial that organisations representing victims are fully consulted on the form, membership and structure of the inquiry.
“Just as with Hillsborough, there must be a ‘families first’ approach at all times.”
The contaminated blood scandal has destroyed families & lives. This inquiry is welcome news. https://t.co/HJEElajKi4
— Tim Farron (@timfarron) July 11, 2017
The announcement came just two days after six party leaders in the Commons – including Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and the Democratic Unionists’ Nigel Dodds – signed a joint letter calling for an inquiry.
Welcoming the move, Mr Corbyn said the investigation should have the potential to trigger prosecutions.
“It was obviously a serious systemic failure. I think we need the strongest possible inquiry that can if necessary lead to prosecution actions as a result, but above all get to the bottom of it,” he said.
“A broad, public, inquisitive inquiry is very important.”
Families of those affected must now have access to the truth of what happened to the 2400 people who lost their lives #Contaminatedblood
— Jo Platt MP (@JoPlattMP) July 11, 2017
Downing Street said it would now open discussions with those affected as to exactly what form the inquiry would take.
“Consultation will now take place with those affected to decide exactly what form the inquiry will take, such as a Hillsborough-style independent panel or a judge-led statutory inquiry,” the Prime Minister’s official spokesman said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here