Police Scotland's chief constable has been urged to step aside while an investigation into claims of gross misconduct takes place.
Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie said Phil Gormley should seek a leave of absence from the post while the Police Investigations and Review Commissioner (Pirc) looks into the allegation.
No information has been given regarding the nature of the complaint against him, but if a serious breach of standards is found, Mr Gormley could face dismissal.
The chief constable said: "I am co-operating fully with the Pirc and will provide all necessary assistance to bring this matter to a timely and satisfactory conclusion.
"In fairness to others who may be involved, it is not appropriate for me to comment further at this time.
"I would like to stress that I remain focused on leading Police Scotland, ensuring that we continue to serve and protect the people of this country."
However, Mr Rennie said that in order for the investigation to be conducted effectively, Mr Gormley should temporarily step aside.
"These allegations of gross misconduct are incredibly serious and require a thorough and prompt investigation," he said.
"For that investigation to be conducted effectively, it will be necessary for the chief constable to seek leave of absence from his post. Any leave of absence should not imply acceptance of guilt.
"Previous cases in Scotland and other parts of the UK have set a precedent, where the person who has been under investigation has temporarily stepped aside."
Scottish Labour justice spokeswoman Claire Baker said: "All allegations must be fully investigated and I'd urge the Police Investigations and Review Commissioner to be as transparent as possible.
"With the most senior police officer under investigation, it is vital that whatever the outcome the public maintains confidence in Police Scotland."
Green MSP John Finnie said: "Allegations of this nature can be damaging to public confidence in the police and it's therefore vital that a thorough investigation is undertaken and the full findings are published."
The investigation followed a referral to the Pirc by the Scottish Police Authority (SPA).
A spokesman for the Pirc said: "Following a referral by the SPA, the commissioner has assessed that the conduct which is the subject of the allegation would, if proved, amount to gross misconduct.
"Once the investigation is concluded, the commissioner must determine whether, in the investigator's opinion, the senior officer has a case to answer in relation to the misconduct allegation.
"The commissioner must submit a report to the SPA containing a summary of the evidence and the investigator's opinion on whether the allegation should be referred to a misconduct hearing.
"Where the authority determines that there is a case to answer for either misconduct or gross misconduct, it must refer the misconduct allegation to a misconduct hearing.
"As this is a live investigation, it would be inappropriate to comment further at this time."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "We note the Pirc investigation and that they will provide a report to the Scottish Police Authority.
"It would not be appropriate to comment on any current investigation."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel