CRAIG David is the most dangerous celebrity to search for online in the UK, according to cybersecurity giant McAfee.
The annual survey analyses the celebrities whose names are the most likely to be used by cybercriminals to try to lure web users to malicious websites or click on links to malicious software.
Fellow singers Emeli Sande, Liam Payne, Adele and Ed Sheeran completed the top five.
McAfee's Nick Viney said: "Having the latest hit albums, videos and movies available on our connected devices immediately is a tempting proposition.
"However, consumers need to be aware of the cybersecurity risks of clicking on links that promise the latest content from celebrities, particularly when they're offering free content.
"When searching for their favourite content online, they need to slow down and assess the links and sources that are showing up in search results. We urge people to think before they click to protect themselves from malware and cybersecurity threats."
According to the security firm's research, more than one in 10 search results for free content for Craig David led to a malicious website.
Musicians dominated the list this year, with Jessie J, Rita Ora, Charli XCX, Lily Allen and Zayn Malik completing the top 10.
The research, which analysed results from Google, Bing and Yahoo, also found that searching for "free MP3" along with a celebrity name returned the highest number of dangerous website results.
The firm said many hackers used consumer fascination with celebrity culture in order to try and drive users to malicious websites, with the aim of stealing personal data.
McAfee urged users to look for official sources and use anti-virus software in order to remain safe from malware and other forms of cyber attack.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel