OLDER people should be grateful they’re still around – because there’s no obvious evolutionary need to live beyond the age of 50, say scientists.
Men’s ability to father children later in life is not the reason why they can survive into their 90s and even beyond.
Likewise women lasting past the menopause serves no obvious purpose.
The discovery disputes the “grandmother hypothesis”
that offers an explanation for why humans live so long after the end of their reproductive age.
According to the theory, elders contribute to the fitness of younger individuals by caring for grandchildren and handing down i mp o r t a nt c u l t u r a l knowledge.
But the latest findings suggest the scientific explanation for human longevity, which has been debated for decades, remains a mystery.
Dr Jacob Moorad, of Edinburgh University’s School of Biological Sciences, said: “Why we live beyond 50 has long puzzled scientists. There are no obvious evolutionary benefits to genes that promote living in infertile individuals.
“We were surprised to find that fertility has little genetic link to male longevity and puzzled we are no closer to explaining why women live far beyond menopause.”
The study published in Nature Ecology and Evolution said the riddle is even more complex than previously thought, with insight into our 50-plus lifespan still evolving
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel