NINE years after Royal Bank of Scotland got a £45 billion Government bailout, the taxpayers who own the bank got a reminder of the scale of the challenge it faces in dealing with the legacy of past problems.
The Bank of England said RBS had emerged as one of the UK’s weakest banks in its latest stress tests based on the lender’s capital position at the end of 2016.
Following a big improvement in that position in recent months, Threadneedle Street gave the bank a pass in its latest stress test. That means officials are confident RBS could withstand the kind of financial crisis that brought the bank to its knees under Fred Goodwin in 2008.
But chief financial officer Ewen Stevenson said the bank will have to deal with “major legacy conduct issues” and finish offloading a huge portfolio of non-core assets before its stress test results meet long term targets.
With RBS dealing with litigation, investigations and reviews covering a range of matters the process of resolving legacy issues may take some time, even if the bank manages to sell off the remaining non-core assets relatively fast.
Directors must ready the bank to deal with the consequences of Brexit at a time when the outlook for the economy is already uncertain.
The Bank of England noted yesterday that big lenders could face serious competitive threats as advances in technology change the financial services sector landscape.
However, the government wants to start selling its 71 per cent holding in RBS shares within 16 months.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here