MSPs have rebuked Justice Secretary Michael Matheson over a lack of transparency in his work with the police oversight body, and demanded he minute all meetings in future.
In a Holyrood debate, the Scottish Tories demanded a “full and independent investigation” into Mr Matheson intervening in a decision of the Scottish Police Authority in November.
After he asked the SPA to “reconsider” its decision to reinstate absentee Chief Constable Phil Gormley despite bullying allegations against him, the SPA performed a swift U-turn.
Despite the gravity of the meeting, it was not minuted.
The Tories's motion said Mr Matheson had “not acted transparently or openly”.
However MSPs, including the government side, backed a Labour compromise by 88 votes to 34 saying all future meetings between the SPA and Government should be minuted.
Labour’s Daniel Johnson said: “The Scottish Government must listen to the will of parliament and instruct civil servants to minute all ministerial meetings as a matter of urgency.”
LibDem MSP Liam McArthur said: “While the Justice Secretary was sensible to ask questions, Parliament has rightly condemned the secrecy surrounding his actions.”
Green MSP John Finnie added: “On the issue of transparency, I'm sure the government will reflect that things perhaps could have been done better.”
A separate Tory motion to pause the merger of British Transport Police and Police Scotland because of behind-the-scenes problems was defeated after the Greens abstained.
Opposition MSPs said ministers had missed a chance to avoid worse trouble down the line.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel