The investigation into the disappearance of RAF gunner Corrie McKeague has cost more than £2.1m in total to date, police said.
Mr McKeague was 23 when he was last seen walking through Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, in September 2016 after a night out with friends.
Suffolk Police said the investigation has cost £1,325,000 plus salary costs of £826,000.
The force added that around 34,000 police officer hours had been spent on the case, not including police staff time or overtime hours.
The total number of police officer overtime hours spent working on the case to date is more than 5,600 hours, costing £235,000.
This figure excludes overtime that will be paid in January relating to December claims, and the force said data about police staff overtime hours is not held.
A Suffolk Police spokesman said: “Careful consideration is always given to all decisions regarding the resourcing of any long-running major investigation.”
Police conducted two searches of a landfill site at Milton near Cambridge last year, with the first search lasting 20 weeks and the second, lasting seven weeks, concluding in December.
No trace of Mr McKeague was found.
It is thought Mr McKeague may have climbed into a waste bin and was taken away by a bin lorry, prompting the landfill search.
A review of the police investigation to date agreed that it was most likely that Mr McKeague ended up in the waste disposal process.
Police have said officers are “committed to continuing with the inquiry”.
Mr McKeague, from Fife but based at RAF Honington in Suffolk, was last seen on CCTV at 3.25am on September 24 2016.
His girlfriend, April Oliver, announced in June that the missing serviceman had become a father with the birth of their daughter.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here