A couple who duped council planners by building a house disguised as a garage have been fined more than £1,000.
Dr Reeta Herzallah, 37, and Hamdi Almasri, 39, built the tiny detached property by converting an old garage.
To get round planning laws, they concealed the dwelling behind a fake garage door.
A court heard how the couple - who have been under investigation by Blaby District Council since October 2015 - also used a fence to hide the house in Enderby, Leicster.
After failing to attend court or enter pleas, they were convicted at Leicester Magistrates Court on Wednesday, February 7 of a raft of planning breaches.
They were ordered to pay £1,252.30 legal costs and a £77 victim surcharge, and will have to restore the garage to its former use.
It was also heard how the tricky couple had created an unauthorised vehicle access onto the busy B4114 dual carriageway road.
After receiving reports of the breaches in October 2015, Blaby District Council approached Herzallah and Almasri in an attempt to rectify the situation.
The pair issued a retrospective planning application in July 2016, but this was rejected and dismissed on appeal by the Planning Inspectorate in February last year.
In May and June, they undertook some "remedial works" which included removing some of the excess fencing.
However, follow up inspections in July, August and November showed that no work had been done to the garage, leading the council to seek prosecution.
Tory Councillor Sheila Scott, the council's cabinet member for planning, said: "The message from this case is clear. If you breach planning regulations and ignore us, we will not just go away.
"Creating an access onto the busy B4114 and blocking off valuable off-road parking space was completely unacceptable.
"We will be following up the successful prosecution with a further visit to ensure that all the requirements of the Breach of Condition Notice are fully complied with."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here