Labour MPs have warned against re-admitting Ken Livingstone to the party ahead of the end of his suspension over anti-Semitism.
The former London mayor was branded an “embarrassment” who would bring Labour into disrepute by prominent backbenchers.
It is understood Mr Livingstone will face a fresh investigation by the National Executive Committee (NEC) when it meets in March and he will not be reinstated until that is resolved.
But his suspension from the party is due to expire in April.
The ex-MP told the Press Association he had “not heard a word” about what was happening with his membership.
“I was suspended almost two years ago. The hearing was April last year. Ever since then I’ve not heard a word.”
Mr Livingstone has always insisted that he said Hitler had supported Zionism at one time, not that Hitler was a Zionist.
The former London mayor avoided expulsion in April 2017 at a disciplinary hearing of the NEC but it suspended him from the party for a further year.
“Everyone was expecting that they were going to expel me but I just pointed out that if they did I would go for judicial review,” he said.
“They didn’t have a chance of winning because I simply stated historical fact. I never said Hitler was a Zionist but that’s the trouble with fake news these days.
“I’ve never heard about any other complaints.
“I’m a retired househusband. I haven’t heard anything from anyone since the inquiry last April.”
He added: “Until some decision is taken I’m not even thinking about it.”
Labour MP Jess Phillips said: “Nothing says socialism quite like ‘I’ll sue you if I don’t get my way’, forgive me but what does he offer the party other than embarrassment and ego?”
Ruth Smeeth, who has suffered anti-Semitic abuse on social media, told the Observer Mr Livingstone “continues to bring the party into disrepute” and “has no place in the party”.
During the general election, Mr Corbyn suggested that Mr Livingstone could face further investigation.
A Labour party spokesman said: “Ken Livingstone is suspended from the Labour Party. It would not be appropriate to comment further on an ongoing disciplinary matter.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel