The leader of the Northern Ireland Greens has warned that a physical border on Ireland following Brexit "will increase the likelihood of violence".
Steven Agnew MLA compared a "mythical" technical solution to a unicorn, and said the only way forward is to remain in the single market and customs union.
Speaking at the Scottish Greens spring conference in Greenock, Inverclyde, he outlined what he believes are the three options regarding the border - leaving the customs union and having a land border, doing the same and have a sea border or remaining in the single market and customs union.
He said: "Just like the unicorn, the so-called technical solution to the border in Ireland is a mythical creature.
"It exists only in Brexiteers' imaginations."
He added: "As Greens we can see that arguing which border is worse is arguing between the frying pan and the fire.
"Either way our economy in Northern Ireland is going to be damaged, either way it will see job losses, either way it will see businesses going to the wall.
"What I want to see in Northern Ireland, and what the Green Party is pushing for, is a political convergence to say that, no, we as Northern Ireland and the whole of the UK must stay in the customs union and ensure no hard border is a meaningful phrase."
He said it is "utterly irresponsible" of the UK Government to place the Irish peace process at risk.
He added: "It is naive to think that in the short 20 years since the Good Friday Agreement that we have cemented the peace to such an extent that we can now start to unravel the agreement that secured it.
"I've no doubt that if there is a a physical border on the island of Ireland, any type of infrastructure, that it will increase the likelihood of violence."
He said if the UK does not remain in the customs union and the single market, "the term no hard border just becomes another Brexit lie".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel