RODDY CAIRNS
The self-driving car - as famously depicted in the David Hasselhoff TV series Knight Rider – is fast becoming reality. With major tech and automotive names such as Tesla, Uber and Google making big strides in their piloting of automated vehicles, and Chancellor Phillip Hammond having pledged to ensure genuine driverless cars on British roads by 2021, what steps are being taken to ensure that this brave new dawn is properly regulated?
Earlier this month, the Centre for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles tasked the Law Commission of England and Wales and the Scottish Law Commission with undertaking a “far-reaching review of the UK’s legal framework for automated vehicles”.
In the shorter term, the Automated and Electric Vehicles Bill is already making its way through the Westminster Parliament to try and resolve some of the most pressing issues raised by automated vehicles.
One of the key areas that the bill seeks to deal with is insurance. At the moment, insurance law is very much driver-centric. But what happens when the human is nothing more than a passenger, and cars can switch between driving autonomously and being driven by a human?
The Government’s solution is to create a “single insurer model”. This means the “victim” of an accident will have a direct right to make a claim against the motor insurer, irrespective of whether the issue relates to the driver’s use of the vehicle or the automation technology. From a product liability perspective, where it is found that the accident was caused by a failing in the vehicle’s automated driving systems, the car insurer would have a right of claim against the vehicle or component part manufacturer.
In what ways might a driver themselves be liable where they have disengaged from the driving process and are trusting their car to do the driving? According to the present wording of the Bill, liability could be attributed to a driver for taking the decision to allow a vehicle to drive itself when it is inappropriate to do so, or where they tamper with the operating system of the car, or fail to install a “safety-critical” update. In such cases, the insurer could potentially recoup some or all of their pay-outs.
And then there are other potential issues where the software causes a car to run a red light, exceed the speed limit or enter a bus lane.
All of this will in the view of some cause a “legal nightmare”.
While the lawyers and politicians consider the minutiae of the legal framework, back in the real world the development of driverless cars continues apace.
Take the GATEway project in Greenwich: a research trial, currently entering its final phase, which sees members of the public invited to ride in driverless shuttle “pods”.
With industries as diverse as parcel delivery and bricklaying joining the increasing trend towards automation, our lawmakers need to get to grips with the issues – and fast.
Roddy Cairns is a solicitor at Burness Paull.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel