Boris Johnson has criticised Russia after it vetoed an American-drafted resolution at the United Nations to create a new body to determine responsibility for the suspected Syria chemical weapons attack.
The Foreign Secretary described the move as “hugely disappointing” and accused Russia of “holding the Syrian people to political ransom”.
It came after Theresa May “agreed” in telephone conversations with Donald Trump and Emmanuel Macron that the international community “needed to respond”.
Mr Johnson tweeted: “Hugely disappointing that Russia vetoed the proposal at the UN for an independent investigation into Syrian chemical attacks.
“Russia is holding the Syrian people to political ransom by supporting a regime responsible for at least 4 heinous chemical attacks against its people.”
Karen Piece, the UK ambassador to the UN, said it was a “sad day for the Security Council” and “for the people of Douma”.
Ms Pierce told the Security Council: “By vetoing, Russia has crossed the line in the international order and worse, if possible, history is repeating itself one year on from Khan Shaykhun.”
Russia was joined by Bolivia in voting ‘no’ at the Security Council in New York on Tuesday afternoon, while China abstained.
Downing Street said the Prime Minister spoke to the US and French presidents on Tuesday, and they agreed to “continue working closely together” to ensure those responsible were “held to account”.
The United States is looking to the UK and France for support as it finalises its response to the assault on the rebel-held town of Douma.
President Trump and his French counterpart Mr Macron had already agreed to co-ordinate a “strong, joint response” after talks by telephone.
A Downing Street spokeswoman said Mrs May held separate calls with the two leaders and that they agreed the reports of a chemical weapons attack in Syria were “utterly reprehensible”.
“They agreed that the international community needed to respond to uphold the worldwide prohibition on the use of chemical weapons.
“They agreed they would continue working closely together and with international partners to ensure that those responsible were held to account.”
Mrs May sidestepped questions about whether Britain would be involved in military action during a visit to Cambridge earlier on Tuesday.
She said: “This attack that took place in Douma is a barbaric attack.
“Obviously we are working urgently with our allies and partners to assess what has happened on the ground.
“If this is the responsibility of Assad’s regime in Syria then it’s yet another example of the brutality and brazen disregard for their people that they show.
“I spoke this morning to President (Emmanuel) Macron, I will be speaking later today with President (Donald) Trump and the National Security Council meets regularly, and I’ll be chairing a meeting of the National Security Council later today, and we’ll be working with our allies as I say, crucially, to make an assessment of what has happened on the ground.”
The National Security Council brings together relevant intelligence and defence chiefs and Cabinet ministers for top level briefings.
President Trump has said an apparent poison gas attack in Syria will be “met forcefully” and held talks with his military leaders in Washington on Monday night.
Mr Trump did not give a time-frame for any retaliatory action, but said the US could not stand by as such atrocities take place because “we are able to stop it”.
The president’s comments came after Moscow’s ambassador to the UN warned of the potential consequences of Western intervention in Syria.
Vassily Nebenzia said US attacks on Syria “could lead to grave repercussions” during heated exchanges at the UN Security Council.
US ambassador Nikki Haley accused Russia of having “the blood of Syrian children” on its hands after Mr Trump said that “nothing’s off the table” in dealing with the alleged outrage.
Mr Nebenzia dismissed claims the Syrian regime had used chemical weapons as “fake news” as he called for inspectors from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons to fly to Syria on Tuesday to visit the site of the attack, which has left at least 40 people, including children, dead.
Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson said in February that Britain should consider joining military action against Assad’s regime if there was fresh “incontrovertible” evidence he had used chemical weapons against his own people.
Mr Johnson discussed the situation with acting US secretary of state John Sullivan twice on Monday.
The US State Department said Mr Johnson and his Washington counterpart had discussed “potential further steps the US and UK governments might take in co-ordination with other partners”.
The attack in Douma happened late on Saturday amid a resumed offensive by Syrian government forces after the collapse of a truce with the Army of Islam rebel group.
Syrian opposition activists and rescuers said poison gas was used on the rebel-held town near the capital, an allegation strongly denied by the Assad government.
Families were reportedly found suffocated in their homes and shelters, with foam on their mouths.
Reports suggested more than 500 people, mostly women and children, were taken to medical centres with difficulty breathing, foaming at the mouth and burning sensations in the eyes.
The attack comes almost exactly a year after a chemical atrocity in the northern Syrian town of Khan Sheikhoun killed dozens of people.
That attack prompted the US to launch several dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles at a Syrian air base.
Russia and Syria have blamed Israel for an attack on a Syrian military airport on Monday that reportedly killed at least 14 people.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel