Stars in a galaxy far, far away formed just 250 million years after the birth of the universe – earlier than any others known, British-led astronomers have found.
The galaxy, MACS1149-JD1, is 13.28 billion light years away and contains the most distant detected source of oxygen.
Its faint light has taken so long to reach Earth that its journey began just 500 million years after the Big Bang – the cataclysmic event that brought the cosmos into being.
Scientists calculated that the galaxy’s stars must have formed 250 million years earlier.
The presence of oxygen is important because it must have come from an even older generation of stars that have completed their life cycle.
Oxygen is only created by nuclear processes within stars, to be released into gas clouds when they die.
Dr Nicolas Laporte, from University College London, who co-led the team, said: “This is an exciting discovery as this galaxy is seen at a time when the Universe was only 500 million years old and yet it already has a population of mature stars.
“We are therefore able to use this galaxy to probe into an earlier, completely uncharted, period of cosmic history.”
The galaxy was studied using the Atacama Large Millimetre/Submillimetre Array (Alma), a powerful radio telescope, and and the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope (VLT). Both facilities are located in Chile’s Atacama desert.
Mystery surrounds the time the first galaxies emerged from total darkness, an epoch known as the “cosmic dawn”.
Co-author Professor Richard Ellis, also from UCL, said: “Determining when cosmic dawn occurred is akin to the Holy Grail of cosmology and galaxy formation.
“With MACS1149-JD1, we have managed to probe history beyond the limits of when we can actually detect galaxies with current facilities.
“There is renewed optimism we are getting closer and closer to witnessing directly the birth of starlight.
“Since we are all made of processed stellar material, this is really finding our own origins.”
The findings appear in the latest issue of Nature journal.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here