SNP ministers are to start work on recommendations from the party’s Growth Commission before rank-and-file SNP members have had a chance to comment on them.
Finance Secretary Derek Mackay, who co-authored the controversial report, told MSPs the Scottish Government would focus on ideas for growing the economy.
Nicola Sturgeon’s office denied there was a “stitch-up” by the party leadership.
The 354-page report was divided into three sections - economic growth, the public finances under independence, and the currency of an independent Scotland.
The first section, which accounted for 30 of the report’s 50 recommendations, will now be analysed by civil servants to see which ideas are possible under current devolved powers, and whether the government will take any of them forward.
The recommendations include a National Economic Strategy, three new commissions on productivity, gender pay equality and infrastructure, and attracting talented migrants.
Other ideas include a Danish-style “flexicurity model” of more flexible employment rules and greater welfare benefits; competitive business taxation; increasing exports; and copying other small countries with higher GDP growth.
EU's absence from SNP independence blueprint dubbed 'ghost at the feast'
Mr Mackay said immigration would require more powers to be devolved, but he felt there was cross-party agreement on the need for Scotland to grow its working-age population.
He added: “The Scottish Government will consider the report’s recommendations on growth carefully to see what more can be done within our existing powers whilst making the case for these powers to be extended.”
Last week, Nicola Sturgeon said the SNP would hold a series of National Assemblies over the summer for party members “to debate and discuss the report’s recommendations ahead of the party’s annual national conference in October”.
The report has proven controversial on the Left of the yes movement, particularly its plan to hold down public spending for a decade and keep the pound after independence.
Key section of SNP independence report is identical to New Zealand Treasury document
Asked whether SNP members or SNP ministers would decide which ideas went forward, the First Minister’s chief of staff said the government would decide.
She said: “We’ll be looking at where we’ve already taken action, what more action we can take, and whether they’re the recommendations the government’s going to take forward.”
She said the recommendations would be considered by one of the national assemblies “in parallel” and the two “no doubt would come together at some point”.
She went on: “The Scottish Government will take forward recommendations the Scottish Government thinks will support the economy, and I would be very surprised if the party doesn’t support recommendations that would also support the economy.
“The Scottish Government will determine which recommendations go forward as we consider the analysis and as the party holds its debates.”
Asked if this was a stitch-up by the SNP leadership, she said: “I’m not getting down that ridiculous path.”
Paul Hutcheon: Labour are the main winners from SNP Growth Commission report
She said the government work should not take long, but did not put a timescale on it.
Scottish LibDem leader Willie Rennie: "The Growth Commission has caused division in the nationalist ranks.
"The SNP's divisive independence plans are bad for Scotland.
"If ministers are thinking of ignoring even their own members then it shows they are prepared to ignore the majority of Scotland who don't want another independence referendum."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel