MICHAEL Gove has denied Westminster is stealing from Scottish farmers amid concerns over a delayed review into how EU subsidies are distributed.
The Environment Secretary launched a Commons attack on the SNP, accusing them of being "grievance-mongering" separatists, when challenged over the issue by Alan Brown, the Nationalist MP for Kilmarnock and Loudoun.
EU Convergence Uplift payments of £190 million to the UK were triggered due to the low rate of Common Agriculture Policy [CAP] payments given to Scottish hill farmers.
READ MORE: Theresa May is facing Downing St showdown with David Davis over Irish 'back-stop' customs plan
Only Scotland qualified for the payments, aimed at distributing the subsidies more fairly based on average euros per hectare. England, Wales and Northern Ireland were all above the threshold.
It was reported last month that the UK Government had only allocated around £30 million of the uplift payments to Scotland, with the rest being distributed around the UK.
Speaking in the Commons, the SNP's Mr Brown asked: "Will he confirm once and for all that Scottish farmers will not see any of the £200 million EU convergence uplift money that Westminster has stolen from them?"
Mr Gove replied: "Westminster hasn't stolen anything from Scotland's farmers. Indeed, it's only thanks to the strength and the unity of the United Kingdom that Scotland's farmers have a firm platform on which to build.
"One of the things that I thought was striking at the General Election, which we all remember with such fondness occurring only 12 months ago, was that Scottish National Party colleagues - many of them talented individuals - lost their seats to Scottish Conservative and Unionist colleagues.
READ MORE: IFS thinktank 'humiliates' Nicola Sturgeon over Growth Commission austerity plan
"Because rural Scotland knows that its interests are better represented by the party of the union than by the divisive, grievance-mongering separatists who masquerade as Scotland's voice but are in fact Scotland's girners," added the Secretary of State.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel