ALISON ROWAT
DID tonight’s thrill-a-minute episode pass in too much of a blur? Here are ten of the finer plot points you may have missed - and some lingering mysteries. Warning: contains spoilers.
Q: Who was the boyfriend of Budd’s ex-wife, Vicky?
A: Meet Mr R Herring, straight from the shoal of dead ends. Writer Jed Mercurio had teased viewers about the boyfriend’s identity, never allowing him to be seen or heard. Perhaps he did not exist, and was being used by Vicky as a way of trying to convince her estranged husband that there was no chance of a reconciliation.
Q: Why didn’t Budd tell his police colleagues he knew the sniper, Andy Apsted, from his Army days?
A: He thought the threat had passed when Apsted killed himself. When Julia fell victim to another assassination attempt it was too late to reveal the connection without making himself look complicit. By that point, the only way for Budd to prove his innocence was to find the guilty party.
Q: Why was Budd trying to buy a rifle on the black market?
A: It was not just any old rifle he was after. He was after the same specialist type that he knew Apsted had used. Whoever had the connections to supply this had put Apsted up to the crime.
Q: Why did it take till the last episode to link Apsted with Budd?
A: Unknown. All Apsted’s associates were supposed to be identified and cross checked. One might have thought Budd would have shown up early on, unless police were searching backwards from Z to A.
Q: Why did Budd keep counter terrorism officer Louise Rayburn in the dark?
A: Rayburn had been a good friend to Budd, tipping him off on several crucial developments. He kept quiet because he did not know how far the conspiracy went, and could not risk what he had found out becoming common knowledge.
Q: Why did Budd make sure the security services got to his flat before the police?
A: To prove they knew about the kompromat (compromising material) that Montague had been given.
Q: Why did Budd insist on defusing the bomb himself?
A: He was not sure how much longer he could maintain pressure on the dead man’s switch, so any expert who tried to help was in danger of being blown up with Budd. He knew this was the same type of device worn by the would-be suicide train bomber in episode one. Since the other vests had been blown up, that meant he was wearing crucial evidence that could lead forensics to the bombmaker and prevent further attacks. Moreover, putting himself in danger showed police he could be trusted.
Q: How did Budd know where Chanel the dodgy PR lived?
A: Perhaps from her personnel file when she was working for Home Secretary Julia Montague? Also intriguing is how he gained entry to her flat.
Q: Why did someone switch live rounds for blanks so that Budd’s suicide bid failed? Why not simply take his gun?
A: If they had taken the firearm from Budd’s hiding place he would have known straight away that someone had been in his flat. Inserting blanks made sure their fall guy was safe. “They were trying to frame me,” explained Budd. “I suppose they couldn’t take the chance of leaving me with live rounds.”
Q: Is Mercurio now a shoo-in for a Bafta?
A: Although previous works, Bodies and Cardiac Arrest, were nominated for Baftas, Mercurio has not won one. He has scooped other prizes, including a Royal Television Society award for Line of Duty.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel