Health boards have spent nearly more than £16.5 million on private security over the last five years, according to figures published by the Scottish Conservatives.
The statistics, revealed through Freedom of Information requests, show that outsourced security cost Scottish boards nearly £4 million last year alone, and the cost is increasing steadily.
The Scottish Conservatives said the figures were a contrast with the Scottish Government's ambition to cut private contracts in the Scottish NHS.
Health boards said there were a variety of reasons for the spending, including being locked into PFI contracts with a security element, and the need to protect disused sites. While some health boards, including NHS Grampian, do not use any private security at all, others have large bills. NHS Lothian has paid £7 million over the last five years to PFI partners Consort and other firms including G4S and Profile.
NHS Lanarkshire recorded the second highest spend, with £5.19 million since 2013/14, largely thanks to PFI arrangements at Hairmyres and Wishaw hospitals.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde's FoI response attributed the board's increased private security spending to a need for round-the-clock protection for empty buildings closed down when staff and services transferred to the new Queen Elizabeth campus.
The board's out-of-hours GP services also needed “an ongoing security presence”, it said..
The figures revealed that total spending on private security across the country by health boards has risen year on year for five years, from £2.8 million in 2013-14 to £3.91 million last year.
Scottish Conservative chief whip Maurice Golden claimed the spending revealed 'hypocrisy' on the part of the Scottish Government.
He added: "The SNP never stops talking about how it despises the use of private companies when it comes to our NHS. Yet here we see, under its watch, spiralling costs when it comes to private security firms.
“From the party that warned a No vote in 2014 would lead to the collapse of the NHS in Scotland because of privatisation, this is quite the hypocrisy.
“It’s another example of the SNP saying one thing to please its supporters, but doing quite another in government."
He said he didn't doubt that the firms provided a valuable service, keeping patients, staff and publicly-owned property safe.
“But it’s clear from this research that some major health boards don’t need to use private firms, which shows this is a choice rather than a necessity, " he said.
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "Any violence or aggression against NHS Scotland staff is unacceptable and we have policies in place to provide and continuously improve a safe working environment.
"We encourage all health boards to commit to supporting appropriate action against anyone who assaults a staff member, including criminal proceedings where appropriate.
"The majority of NHS services are provided by permanent NHS staff working on NHS contracts at NHS rates of pay."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel