UK tourists will pay less for goods in almost half of popular holiday destinations this year despite the volatility of the pound, new research suggests.
Analysis by Post Office Travel Money found the cost of tourist staples such as meals, sun cream and coffee has fallen in 19 resorts and cities compared with 12 months ago.
Singapore and St Lucia head the list of destinations where holiday costs have fallen in the past year, down 22% and 20% respectively.
While those falls were due to cheaper local charges for meals and drinks, a sharp rise in the value of sterling against the Brazilian real explains why the cost of essentials in Rio de Janeiro is down 20%.
Bulgaria’s Sunny Beach topped the 2019 costs barometer, with the basket of goods costing £36, including a bottle of beer at a bar (59p), a cup of coffee (74p) and a three-course evening meal for two with a bottle of wine (£27.44).
Turkey’s Marmaris was in second place (£45), followed by Portugal’s Algarve and South Africa’s Cape Town (both £50).
The most expensive destination in the annual report was Mahe in the Seychelles, where the same items cost UK visitors £183, including £128.53 for an evening meal.
Abu Dhabi was the destination with the second highest prices (£169), followed by Jumeirah, Dubai (£150) and Darwin, Australia (£147).
Post Office Travel Money expert Andrew Brown said: “It is good news that prices are down in many destinations this year, but it is still very important to be aware of the huge variation in costs we found across the 42 countries surveyed.
“For example, barometer costs in the six cheapest resorts and cities are less than half those in the 15 priciest destinations.
“That’s why we advise holidaymakers to draw up a destination shortlist and do their homework by comparing the prices for meals, drinks and other tourist items before booking. Forearmed is forewarned.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here