The social work chief in charge of an investigation into the death of two year old Lauren Wade said hers was the most shocking case of neglect he had seen in his 50 year career.
Colin Anderson, the independent chair of Glasgow’s Child Protection Committee headed up a significant case review launched after murder charges were brought against Lauren’s mother Margaret Wade and her partner Marie Sweeney.
The charges were later reduced to wilful ill-treatment and neglect, but Mr Anderson said: “This is a unique case. It is the most deviant and devious parenting I have ever encountered.” He added that he had been “personally distressed” when police showed him evidence about the scene in which Lauren died.
Read more: Death of Lauren Wade: Couple who starved toddler jailed for six years each
The review found a series of failures by health and social services meant the infant was barely on the radar of social services at the time of her death from complications caused by malnutrition.
Although concerns were raised by a primary school attended over two other children, who were unkempt, dirty and had repeated head lice infestations, education, health and social services all failed to give enough consideration to the fact that Lauren was also at risk.
When shocked police attended the house in Townhead, Glasgow, where the family lived, they found it so infested with head lice that the bugs had eaten a hole in the sofa, and could even be seen on the outside of the front door.
Bin bags littered the flat and the ambulance called for Lauren later had to be fumigated, as did the room in which Wade, Sweeney and two other children were held temporarily by police.
Lauren’s hair had not been brushed for days and a post mortem revealed unexplained traces of diazepam and paracetamol in her system.
Although Lauren had been seen 13 times by health visitors, including eight home visits, and Wade had made 17 visits to pharmacies over two years, and had only partially heeded advice given about treating the children’s head lice, too little was done, the report says. The school and health services thought Wade was a struggling single mum, but were persuaded the situation was improving and social workers were only alerted to the case in May 2014.
Wade, who told workers she was the only adult in the house, deliberately concealed problems from social service staff and although social workers visited the home in June 2014, they were reassured that Wade and Sweeney– who worked as a cleaner – were making improvements.
In fact, Lauren was about to go into a period of rapid decline but though she was seen again by a health visitor in July 2014, there was no further contact from any agency until her death was discovered in March 2015.
The report says Lauren’s needs were never properly assessed while she slowly starved to death. It says much remains a mystery, including why Wade and Sweeney concealed their relationship and why they fed the two older girls but not Lauren.
It says there is a danger social services in deprived areas have too high a threshold for intervening in cases of neglect, calling for “clarity..[in] providing interventions for children in areas of multiple deprivation who have the same right to protection as all other children.”
Colin Anderson said lessons from the case had already changed practices in Glasgow, including the way workers respond to neglect and better communication between agencies. But he said workers needed to show more ‘nosiness’ and where there were concerns should not stop challenging parents until they were completely satisfied.
“Workers need to own their concerns, not pass them on to someone else, and push and push and push until they get answers,” he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here