THE SNP has rejected calls to let another party chair the Holyrood inquiry around Alex Salmond, despite its potential to embarrass the government.
Nicola Sturgeon's party insisted on exercising its right to convene the inquiry, turning down demands from the opposition to relinquish control.
Parliament’s business bureau agreed today to create a special committee to look into the collapse of the Scottish government’s sexual misconduct investigation into Mr Salmond.
The former First Minister won a judicial review at the Court of Session earlier this month after forcing ministers to admit their probe was unfair, unlawful and tainted by apparent bias.
The government’s defeat left taxpayers with a £500,000 legal bill.
The inquiry is expected to examine a series of meetings between Mr Salmond and Ms Sturgeon last year, while he was under investigation by her officials.
Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard last week urged the First Minister to allow an opposition party to chair the probe in order to maintain public trust.
“This is an unprecedented situation and Nicola Sturgeon must agree that this inquiry will be chaired by an opposition MSP. Nicola Sturgeon should do the right thing,” he said.
As the largest party in parliament, the SNP has the automatic right to the position.
However it is understood that Graeme Dey, the SNP minister appointed by Ms Sturgeon to sit on the business bureau, was unmoved when the idea was put to him.
Nine MSPs will now sit on the inquiry, with an SNP convener and Tory deputy convener.
In total, there will be four SNP MSPs, two Tories and one Labour, LibDem and Green.
Mr Salmond last week appeared in court charged with two attempted rapes, nine sexual assaults, two indecent assaults and one breach of the peace.
He vehemently denies any criminality.
The Holyrood inquiry is expected to mothball itself until after the criminal proceedings.
It is then expected to take evidence over several months, possibly in the run up to the next Holyrood election.
Scottish Tory chief whip Maurice Golden said: “I am pleased progress has been made on the creation of this committee which will investigate matters of significant importance.
“However, we are disappointed the SNP has refused to forfeit convenership of a committee probing issues which have occurred within its own party.
“There will be further opportunities in coming weeks for the nationalists to reconsider this move, and voters will expect them to do exactly that.”
Labour MSP Neil Findlay said: "Labour argued against the SNP chairing this committee during the meeting, but did not want to block establishing the committee.
"It is now a matter for the SNP to decide if it thinks chairing the committee is appropriate - ultimately the election of a convener is a matter for the committee so the option is still open for an MSP from an opposition party to chair the committee."
Scottish LibDem leader Willie Rennie said: “All parties have unanimously agreed to the establishment of this committee and its remit and timescale are now being finalised.
“We have previously suggested that the SNP should consider stepping aside from chairing this committee.
“However, it is now up to them to put forward a convenor who can command the respect of parliament.
“This committee will address the concerns that have arisen over the actions of the First Minister, her advisers and officials. Its purpose will be to give confidence that people can make complaints about harassment in the future and have their complaint dealt with seriously and effectively.”
A Scottish Parliament spokesperson said: “Bureau members unanimously agreed to the establishment of a 9 person committee, convened by a member of the SNP with the Deputy Convener coming from the Conservative Party.
The Bureau will finalise issues around remit and membership at its next meeting.”
An SNP spokesperson said: "This is a matter for the Parliamentary Bureau, in which all Holyrood parties are represented.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel