Transport Secretary Michael Matheson hit back at Tory and Labour claims that the Scottish Government has "betrayed" people in Glasgow after plans for a rail link to the city's airport were ditched for a second time.
Mr Matheson insisted pressing ahead with plans for either a tram or train link from the centre of Glasgow to the airport would have a "detrimental impact" on other rail services in the west of Scotland.
READ MORE: Glasgow Airport rail link plan axed again
Ministers had originally ditched proposals for a rail link in 2009.
The scheme was then resurrected as part of the £1 billion-plus Glasgow City Region Deal, which was signed in 2014.
Mr Matheson confirmed to MSPs that leading figures in the City Region Deal will soon be asked to approve work on alternative plans, which could see a shuttle pod system built to run between the airport and nearby Paisley Gilmour Street rail station.
But Labour MSP Colin Smyth insisted this was a "second rate option".
He hit out: "This is the second time the SNP have axed plans for a rail link to Glasgow Airport, and yet another betrayal of the people of Glasgow and the West of Scotland.
"The city of Glasgow continues to grow, Glasgow Airport continues to grow, but so too does the utter lack of ambition by this SNP Government and the SNP leadership in Glasgow and Renfrewshire councils."
Adam Tomkins, Conservative MSP for Glasgow, also hit out at the Scottish Government, saying: "Anyone who cares about the economic growth of Glasgow would see immediately that Glasgow needs a direct rail link to its airport, yet the SNP are cancelling such a plan for the second time in a decade.
"This is nothing less than a betrayal of Glasgow."
He added that the decision shows SNP ministers "could not care less about Glasgow's future economic prosperity".
Fellow Tory MSP Jamie Greene noted that the alternative proposal "only connects the airport to Paisley".
He added that this "surely flies in the face of the spirit of the intention of the city deal to connect Glasgow Airport and Glasgow city centre itself".
But Mr Matheson said: "The Tories know much more about betraying the people of Scotland and in particular the people of Glasgow than anybody else in this chamber."
He argued that services to and from Glasgow Central station would suffer if a new rail link was installed - adding that this could result in the loss of thousands of seats during peak periods.
Mr Matheson said: "Analysis has shown that to accommodate tram/train services at the airport, performance on the wider rail network would be negatively impacted and require either the reduction of current rail services to and from Ayrshire and Inverclyde, or the deferral of future service enhancements, and/or significant high-cost infrastructure in and around Glasgow Central."
The Transport Secretary added: "We cannot ignore the fact that a tram/train option would have a detrimental impact on the network and has many real and potentially insurmountable challenges."
He told MSPs that the leaders of Glasgow and Renfrewshire councils had "recognised that current and future rail services should not be compromised and that the case for tram/train set out in the original outline business case was not robust in this regard".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel