Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has been warned the party risks "catastrophic" damage to support in leave-supporting seats after backing a second referendum on Brexit.
Mr Corbyn said if Theresa May's Brexit deal gets through Parliament "there must be a confirmatory public vote".
READ MORE: Theresa May offers MPs Article 50 delay vote
The shift in policy, which would see voters asked to decide between a deal and remaining in the EU, won plaudits from Remain-supporting MPs but led to warnings of electoral disaster in some of Labour's heartlands.
The move also led to a spat between shadow cabinet ministers and anonymous party sources over the details of the pledge.
Speaking in the Commons, Mr Corbyn said: "The Prime Minister's botched deal provides no certainty or guarantees for the future and was comprehensively rejected by this House.
"We cannot risk our country's industry and people's livelihoods and so if it somehow does pass in some form at a later stage, we believe there must be a confirmatory public vote to see if people feel it is what they voted for."
Labour has said it will either support a motion calling for a referendum or table one itself.
Labour MP John Mann said the move would be "catastrophic to Labour in the Midlands and the north".
READ MORE: Richard Leonard defies majority of Scots to back Brexit over second referendum
The Bassetlaw MP, who voted to leave the EU, told BBC Radio 4's Today: "Voters won't have it. The last person to renege on their manifesto was Nick Clegg, it didn't end very well for him on tuition fees.
"Our manifesto was unambiguous, we would accept the result of the referendum. A second referendum doesn't do that and the voters - in very, very large numbers - will not accept that."
Stoke Central MP Gareth Snell suggested that shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer had engineered the shift in Labour's stance.
"If I was being a bit unkind, part of me thinks this has been what Keir wanted all along, to move the Labour Party to a point of so much confusion this seems to be the only way forward," he told the BBC.
"Which is disappointing, because in the early days I thought he really wants to speak to those of us in leave areas who have real concerns, not just for what this means for our party but what this means for the connection our party has with those communities."
READ MORE: Brexit: Jeremy Corbyn moves to back second EU poll - with Remain on ballot paper
Meanwhile, senior shadow Cabinet ministers defended the policy amid suggestions senior party sources were briefing against them.
Sir Keir told BBC Radio 4's Today that "elected politicians" - rather than aides - were setting out the Labour position.
Shadow foreign secretary Emily Thornberry said: "I've seen some nonsense that I 'misspoke' earlier on a public vote.
"Pretty hard to misspeak identically in 10 interviews, but for clarity: if Theresa May won't accept our deal, then the public must decide: do we accept whatever deal she gets through, or do we Remain? Got it?"
Deputy Labour leader Tom Watson said: "Whoever briefed that my colleague 'misspoke' undermines the sovereignty of the current shadow cabinet."
The Prime Minister claimed the policy shift meant Mr Corbyn "has gone back on his promise to respect the referendum result and now wants to hold a divisive second referendum that would take our country right back to square one".
"Anyone who voted Labour at the last election because they thought he would deliver Brexit will rightly be appalled," she said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel