By Paul Hutcheon
POLICE Scotland has overhauled its whistleblowing procedures by funding an independent advice line for officers.
Protect, a charity that specialises in helping people who wish to raise concerns, will give officers the option of speaking to experts about issues such as corruption and other wrongdoing.
Scottish Conservative shadow justice secretary Liam Kerr said: “Given what has happened in the service in recent years, we need an independent and reliable reporting service now more than ever. Hopefully this step will allow officers and staff to feel more able to report any issues that they see so that they can be properly addressed.”
Police Scotland has faced criticism over the the way its internal whistleblowing system has operated since 2014.
The force’s Professional Standards Department and the now-defunct Counter Corruption Unit were often the subject of complaints themselves. Officers felt uncomfortable about raising matters if they related to the PSD or CCU.
Some detectives believed their complaints were not taken seriously, while others argued that the CCU, which has been rebadged, also targeted individual officers.
In an interview last year, Police Investigations & Review Commissioner Kate Frame said some whistleblowers were scared to come forward with allegations against colleagues or bosses.
She also called for the single force to learn from England and Wales by allowing an independent organisation to manage Police Scotland’s whistleblowing hotline.
Officers who wish to raise concerns about colleagues are presented with a range of options, such as using the “Integrity Matters” system or contacting a line manager.
But in a nod to Frame, Police Scotland has added an independent element by giving officers the chance of speaking to experts unconnected to the force.
Protect, formerly Public Concern at Work, has advised around 40,000 people on its free and confidential advice line, and will provide the service for the force.
The change also confirms that Police Scotland is comfortable using the word “whistleblowing”, unlike in previous years. Phil Gormley, the former chief constable, said in 2016: “I am simply aware that there are a range of views on the term ‘whistleblowing’. It does not offend me, but some people would say that it has a pejorative context.”
In an article posted on the force’s intranet, Assistant Chief Constable Alan Speirs said: “Whistleblowing is an important source of information that can highlight serious risks to the effectiveness and efficiency of the organisation, with individuals often being best placed to identify deficiencies and problems at the earliest opportunity.
“Police Scotland has a number of options available to people. I am delighted to welcome a leading voice with a strong track record in whistleblowing advice to provide this service.”
Speaking to this newspaper, Speirs added: “There are a number of routes within Police Scotland where they can report matters like this.
“Ideally we would encourage them to use those routes, but where an individual, just for different reasons, may lack the confidence to do that, this offers something independent and outside Police Scotland.”
Asked about Gormley’s previous comment, he said: “It’s something that has been discussed in great detail, but it is terminology that applies way beyond Police Scotland, so we are really comfortable with the terminology.”
Jon Cunningham, interim chief executive at Protect, said: “We are delighted to be working with Police Scotland offering whistleblowers support and advice.
“Speaking up about concerns isn’t easy, so we would like to reassure Police Scotland officers and staff that we are here to help.
“Police Scotland, like many of our clients, recognise an open transparent whistleblowing culture is key to supporting a strong workforce and serves as a risk governance tool to flag any wrongdoing.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel