Bill Cosby has agreed to settle lawsuits filed by seven women who say he defamed them when he accused them of lying about sexual misconduct allegations.
Filings on Friday in federal court in Springfield, Massachusetts, in the US, show the two sides have negotiated a settlement since Cosby went to prison last autumn in a separate Pennsylvania sex assault case.
The 81-year-old comedian is serving a three to 10-year prison sentence there.
The federal judge overseeing the defamation case in Massachusetts must still approve the settlement. The terms are confidential.
It is not yet clear whether Cosby will now drop his counterclaims against the seven women. One of them recently died.
They are among the dozens of women who have accused Cosby of sexual misconduct.
He has denied their allegations and is appealing against his Pennsylvania conviction.
The women suing Cosby for defamation say he defamed them by calling them liars after they went public with allegations of sexual assault.
Cosby has denied their allegations.
Lawyer Joseph Cammarata, who represents the women, told The Associated Press on Friday that “each plaintiff is satisfied with the settlement”.
He warned in a status report also filed Friday that his clients would seek to depose Cosby and gather other documents and evidence if he does not drop the counterclaims, which accuse the women of harming his reputation through their accusations.
Cosby’s wife, Camille, had been ordered to give a deposition in the case in 2016, after a heated court fight over her testimony.
Lawyers for the Cosbys tried to quash her subpoena to testify, saying she did not have any relevant information on the women’s claims and that any marital conversations she had with her husband of 50 years were confidential.
The judge agreed that marital conversations were private, but the women’s lawyers noted she also served as his business manager throughout their long marriage.
The case had largely been put on hold, though, while Cosby was amid the Pennsylvania criminal case, which involved a 2017 trial that ended in a deadlock and his conviction at a 2018 retrial.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here