DEBENHAMS was preparing to enter into pre-pack administration as the department store appeared to continue to stand back from approaches by Sports Direct.
The sportswear firm said that its latest £150 million backing offer had been rejected, putting the high street retailer on course for a probable administration.
UPDATE: Mike Ashley makes £200 million rescue offer for Debenhams
A source connected to Debenhams said that for the company, which has 14 stores in Scotland, the most likely outcome is now the announcement of a pre-pack administration arrangement.
This move would mean “game over” for Sports Direct’s current ambition to put money into the company, the source said.
The latest package promised included an offer to underwrite a £150m rights issue, and there was a condition that Sport Direct chief Mike Ashley be made chief executive of Debenhams.
READ MORE: Debenhams on brink of administration: Everything we know so far
In a statement to the market on Monday afternoon, Sports Direct said its proposal had been rebuffed and called for the Debenhams board and its lenders to engage in further negotiations over the chain.
It was claimed Mr Ashley was previously given a deadline of 5pm on Monday to fulfil one of two conditions to prevent Debenhams from falling into the hands of lenders.
If neither was fulfilled, it was expected the retailer is likely to go into administration, wiping out Sports Direct’s stake and all other shareholders.
Over the weekend Mr Ashley was again vocal over the running of the stores, criticising Debenhams executives.
Mr Ashley has a near-30 per cent stake in the department store but faces the wipeout if it presses ahead with a £200m refinancing plan announced in March.
BREAKING: Mike Ashley makes £200 million rescue offer for Debenhams
Sports Direct said that while it “continues to actively evaluate all possible options to support Debenhams, it wishes to clarify that, as a technical matter, were it to complete, the equity issuance would be an alternative transaction to the possible offer and vice versa”.
The Newcastle United owner made the now-rejected offer on Friday, saying it would form part of a “comprehensive refinancing” of Debenhams and would be contingent on the retailer’s lenders agreeing to write off debt.
Sports Direct was continuing to consider a conventional takeover, priced at 5p per share.
The source said: “If it [Debenhams] does go into administration, this is only the next step on the road to refinancing the business before you get onto the next step of restructuring the business and hopefully end up with a business that is smaller but it has a future.”
Laith Khalaf, senior analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: “Mike Ashley hasn’t yet thrown in the towel in his pursuit of Debenhams.
READ MORE: Mike Ashley 'tells Debenhams director to take lie detector test'
“In theory a deal could be struck, but relations seem far from cordial, and the Debenhams management look set on giving the lenders control of the high street chain.
“The job isn’t an easy one, but they need to balance the interests of shareholders, lenders and employees.
“So far they haven’t given a great deal of detail as to why Sports Direct’s proposals have been kicked to the kerb, while lenders have been handed the keys to the company.
“If the protagonists in this drama could find a way to preserve some value for shareholders, while keeping the commercial wheels turning, that would probably satisfy all parties.”
He also said: “The difficulty is that as part of its recent refinancing, Debenhams has already agreed to terms which means lenders approach any negotiations from a position of strength.” Shares were down more than 10% at 1.83p.
Debenhams declined to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here