Talks between Theresa May and EU leaders look set to rumble on into the night as they seek to make a breakthrough on the latest Brexit roadblock.
It is believed that most around the table at an emergency summit in Brussels tonight favour offering the UK an extenstion of up to a year to cobble together a withdrawl deal capable of passing through the House of Commons.
However, French president Emmanuel Macron insisted that “nothing is settled” prior to the meeting and sources say he is yet to declare his hand to those round the table.
Other leaders have indicated they were ready to back European Council president Donald Tusk’s proposal of a long extension to Article 50 talks.
A read from inside the Council room – several leaders have spoken, vast majority in favour of a long extension, with some favouring December and some March of next year. Dutch PM Mark Rutte spoke first. Macron has not spoken yet.
— Pat Leahy (@PatLeahyIT) April 10, 2019
Mrs May has asked for a delay to June 30, with a break clause allowing the UK to leave as soon as Parliament has ratified her Withdrawal Agreement.
But pressed over whether she stood by her comment in Parliament that “as Prime Minister” she would not delay Brexit beyond the end of June, she responded that the important issue was securing the flexibility to leave early and avoid having to take part in European elections in May.
Tory sources said that the PM stood by commitments made to the backbench 1922 Committee that she would hand over to a successor for the second phase of negotiations after ratification.
Mr Tusk’s proposals could postpone the opening of the next phase, dealing with the future UK/EU trade and security relationship, to the spring of 2020.
READ MORE: Independence would allow Scotland 'to sit at EU top table' - Nicola Sturgeon
Mrs May set out her case for a short extension in a presentation behind closed doors lasting around one hour, during which she answered questions from the leaders of the 27 other member states.
She then left the room to allow the EU27 to discuss the UK’s future in her absence over a dinner of scallop salad, loin of cod with brown shrimps and iced macadamia nut parfait.
An apparently relaxed Prime Minister laughed and smiled with Angela Merkel as the German chancellor showed her pictures on her tablet computer depicting the pair wearing jackets of exactly the same shade of blue as they addressed their parliaments earlier in the day.
Mrs Merkel told German MPs that the EU27 “may well” go for a longer delay, although the UK would be allowed to leave “very quickly” if Parliament approves a withdrawal deal.
But as he arrived in Brussels, Mr Macron insisted that “for me, nothing is settled, and in particular no long extension”.
Despite having face-to-face talks with the PM in Paris on Tuesday, the French President said he needed more “clarity” and was “impatient” to hear what Mrs May would say.
“We must understand today why this request? What is the political project which justifies it and what are the clear proposals?” he said.
Mrs May said: “I have asked for an extension to June 30, but what is important is that any extension enables us to leave at the point at which we ratify the Withdrawal Agreement, so we can leave on May 22 and start to build our brighter future.”
READ MORE: SNP hit back as Theresa May claims independent Scotland could not stay in EU
In a swipe at the Brexit rebels who blocked her Withdrawal Agreement from passing through Parliament in time to leave on the scheduled date of March 29, Mrs May said: “I know many people are frustrated that the summit is taking place at all, because the UK should have left the EU by now.
“I greatly regret the fact that Parliament hasn’t been able to pass a deal that would have enabled us to leave in a smooth and orderly way.
“But I and the Government continue to work to find a way forward. We have been talking with the opposition. There’s been serious and constructive talks and they will continue tomorrow.”
Other leaders said that the main condition likely to be imposed in return for any extension was that Britain should prepare for European Parliament elections on May 23, though it need not actually vote if ratification is achieved earlier.
Lithuanian President Dalia Grybauskaite rejected suggestions that countries like hers now held Britain’s fate in their hands.
READ MORE: Iain Macwhirter - Dear EU 27, here’s why you shouldn’t give up on Scotland
“It is only up to the UK to decide,” she said. “Your country’s future is only in your hands, nobody else. It’s only up to you.
“You decide your fate, not us. We would only like to help you make this decision.”Labour’s Jeremy Corbyn welcomed comments from Irish Taoiseach Leo Varadkar suggesting he is ready to contemplate a role for the UK in helping decide EU trade policies if it remains in a customs union after Brexit.
Mr Varadkar said that it would be in the UK’s interests to remain within the European trading bloc.
And he added: “It’s also in our interest to have the UK to be in our bloc and I think we would be generous in understanding that the UK couldn’t be a silent partner and would have to have a say in decisions being made.”
A customs union arrangement with a British say on trade deals is a central plank of Labour’s plan for Brexit.
Mr Corbyn responded with a tweet: “The Irish prime minister Leo Varadkar has confirmed this evening that Labour’s alternative plan for a new customs union with a UK say on future trade deals is credible and deliverable.”
The unanimous agreement of all 27 remaining EU states is needed to avoid a no-deal Brexit at 11pm on Friday, April 12.
The depth of the anger within Tory ranks was underlined by a Commons vote on Tuesday, when 97 Tory MPs voted against a motion backing Mrs May’s call for an extension.
But pro-EU Justice Secretary David Gauke suggested she could carry on as PM until she has taken the country through the current phase of the negotiations and Britain has finally left the EU.
“I don’t think we should be rushing to change our leader when there is a big task to be done,” he told BBC Radio 5 live.
“If we are going through that process of trying to get Parliament to support a deal to find a way of breaking this deadlock, then Theresa May continues to be the right person to lead us through that process.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel